This was disputed??!?!?!
If anything Pokemon will solidify this with the naysayers.
This was disputed??!?!?!
If anything Pokemon will solidify this with the naysayers.
rubido said:
|
Oh, I seem to have counted GBC as own Gen...(I mean, you couldn't play certain GBC games on the GB, could you?)
Nintendo has never lost in the handheld market (counting phones is dumb) so any realistic person knows sony wasn't going to take that from them when the PSP didn't even get close.
Please stop lumping every Vita owning together bc you have a quote of someone saying something crazy. No one likes that and you wouldn't like it if we put ever nintendo supporter in a bubble with the few extremist.
I personally own both and even with the fewer total titles I enjoy the vita far more. It's an opinion everyone is different.
TruckOSaurus said:
Gilgamesh did : http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=140560&page=1 |
And promptly laughed at by everyone. I took it as a joke.
Otakumegane said: I don't mess in the Official Vita thread now do I? And look the thread's right. The 3DS won the gen, there's no other way to really put it. To state that one think it didn't because it's based on the "opinion" of the extremely smaller minority is pushing it. Just accept the loss and move on. |
No one, not even the most die hard Sony fan is going to be in denial that Nintendo sales are going to be on top. The reason I posted that was to argue the quality of games over the 3DS because it was stated that regardless what you argued, the 3DS hands down had better quality. I listed every first party game and every highly praised game for the 3DS as well as personal favorites, compared to high praised games on the Vita. Took that beyond and compared multiconsole title differences between Vita and 3DS where the Vita heavily outweighed the competition in quality, whether it was MGS2 being included with MGS3, or the higher performing versions of other titles.
The point of the post was that the Vita can easily be argued that it has more quality titles than the 3DS. This is the reason I bolded this statement which was in the quote specifically. Just seems to me that Nintendo fans don't like to be proven wrong so you're making such a big deal about the post.
"You can argue quality in different ways, I get that, and the 3DS may be for you. But on almost every way you look at it, the 3DS wins out. The only way it doesn't is if you really don't like Nintendo games, and if such, why get a 3DS in the first place?"
Maybe I should have this picture added to my sig since everyone is offended every time someone says something bad about their preferred console. My two 3DS systems next to my Vita. Because apparently, anyone that says anything bad towards one console developer must not own that console.
The sales might be on top, but really, what games other than 1st party nintendo games really sell in the million pluses. We can all say that "Well 3ds has got SMT, Monster Hunter and other games!" Ok but those games dont even sell well and I would not be surprised if some of those franchises come back to their fan base on the ps vita. Monster Hunter didnt do that well in NA, SMT does not sell much on 3ds either. Persona 4 Golden alone outsells every SMT ever released on a nintendo handheld, not combined, but separately. Im not putting the 3ds down, I actually like it, but you guys act like each of these games are going to sell millions lol. I pulled these numbers from this very site. All the SMT titles on psp also sold much more than the 3ds/ds titles. Maybe one day Atlus will realize it. Maybe Devil Summoner 3 could come to vita, who knows.
KingKazuma34 said: The sales might be on top, but really, what games other than 1st party nintendo games really sell in the million pluses. We can all say that "Well 3ds has got SMT, Monster Hunter and other games!" Ok but those games dont even sell well and I would not be surprised if some of those franchises come back to their fan base on the ps vita. Monster Hunter didnt do that well in NA, SMT does not sell much on 3ds either. Persona 4 Golden alone outsells every SMT ever released on a nintendo handheld, not combined, but separately. Im not putting the 3ds down, I actually like it, but you guys act like each of these games are going to sell millions lol. I pulled these numbers from this very site. All the SMT titles on psp also sold much more than the 3ds/ds titles. Maybe one day Atlus will realize it. Maybe Devil Summoner 3 could come to vita, who knows. |
Your really don't understand differances in franchises or the sales of the games do you?
Former something....
kupomogli said:
Those who own multiple consoles or game on PC couldn't care less about sales and rather focus on the quality. All I care about is the games. My judgment of the best portable, console, etc, is all dependent on which systems get the most amount of quality releases and how good those releasese actually are.
This is a very poor way of thinking right here. I'm not a fan of pirates for any system. It's what killed the Dreamcast in the west and while the PSP kept selling, it killed the potential for future releases and the chance for many of the games to actually receive a western release. |
Poor way of thinking, maybe. Will it make a difference if I use homebrew to play Super Mario Bros. on the NES emulator? No. And FTR the Dreamcast shot themselves in the foot with limited graphical capability over PS2, Gamecube, and Xbox. Plus, you can't easily pirate a game over 1000MB. I only pirate oldies. NES-64 because you can't really buy the games anymore. I know my limits good sir. I knoweth them well too.