No, though I guess people have different ideas about what constitutes "revolutionary". For instance, the NES was revolutionary, as was the PS2 for having a DVD player. These things changed gaming and future gaming consoles. Calling motion controls revolutionary at this point, however, kind of bothers me, as it's looking like more of a fad than a permanent change. We'll have to see how Kinect 2.0 catches on.
Personally, I don't need revolution. Remember, revolution isn't always a good thing. I much prefer evolution. What I want from hardware is a high quality canvas for the games themselves, which I think is where the innovation should come from.