By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - SuperBot Hiring For Possible 'PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale' Sequel

Dear god, this again? First off, what people were predicting on random internet forums does not matter. Like, at all. The people at WWS weren't sitting around going, "but they said it would do 3M by the end of the year on gamrConnect ... ." Second, anyone saying this was supposed to be a "big holiday title" are either fooling themselves or they're inflating expectations so they claim those lofty expectations weren't met. No one at WWS thought this was going to be the next Uncharted.

Before it even launched, I said that the purpose of this game was to build brand recognition for the series and to eventually be a base game for PS+. Not to be a huge individual sales machine. It's there to fill a need, to be Sony's party-type game. Not every investment should be judged solely on its own numbers. In business, sometimes you spend money on things to improve the whole of your production, not just to register an immediate return.

Sony is probably going to try to get this game into people's hands any way they can. PS+, giving it away with bundles, anything that will grow the player base, which will grow the franchise with regards to future installments.

I know there are some sad human beings out there who desperately want this series to die but, unfortunately for them, it's probably here to stay.



Around the Network
tbone51 said:
Also most psv was crossbuy??? Does that count for sales.??? Just asking

It was crossbuy but you could also choose to purchase the Vita version alone because it was something like 20$ cheaper. If you bought ps3 version and got vita for free it only counts as one sale. Otherwise the Vita sale would have been 170k+ (same or higher than PS3)



enditall727 said:

lets see how the legs will do while still being at $60


I think it's too late for that



Ongoing bet with think-man: He wins if MH4 releases in any shape or form on PSV in 2013, I win if it doesn't.

pokoko said:
Dear god, this again? First off, what people were predicting on random internet forums does not matter. Like, at all. The people at WWS weren't sitting around going, "but they said it would do 3M by the end of the year on gamrConnect ... ." Second, anyone saying this was supposed to be a "big holiday title" are either fooling themselves or they're inflating expectations so they claim those lofty expectations weren't met. No one at WWS thought this was going to be the next Uncharted.

Before it even launched, I said that the purpose of this game was to build brand recognition for the series and to eventually be a base game for PS+. Not to be a huge individual sales machine. It's there to fill a need, to be Sony's party-type game. Not every investment should be judged solely on its own numbers. In business, sometimes you spend money on things to improve the whole of your production, not just to register an immediate return.

Sony is probably going to try to get this game into people's hands any way they can. PS+, giving it away with bundles, anything that will grow the player base, which will grow the franchise with regards to future installments.

I know there are some sad human beings out there who desperately want this series to die but, unfortunately for them, it's probably here to stay.

I see this game more as a test for whats to come on the PS4 version of All Stars. I mean they did spend quite a bit of time on the characters themselves but the graphics are nothing too impressive (good but not great) and the menu is so bland and boring. I have high hopes for SuperBot. I can see from the feedback they are giving that they are a great developer.



riderz13371 said:
tbone51 said:
Also most psv was crossbuy??? Does that count for sales.??? Just asking

It was crossbuy but you could also choose to purchase the Vita version alone because it was something like 20$ cheaper. If you bought ps3 version and got vita for free it only counts as one sale. Otherwise the Vita sale would have been 170k+ (same or higher than PS3)



Makes sense!!! Thanks By the way this game wont make even half of a mil this year! but i think lifetime it can reach over 800k not including bundle IMO



Around the Network

Chandler said:



enditall727 said:
lets see how the legs will do while still being at $60





I think it's too late for that


Holy crap it got price cut that much already!!!!



Chandler said:
enditall727 said:

lets see how the legs will do while still being at $60


I think it's too late for that

no, it's still $60

i just checked gamestop



Let the first one finish flopping first.



nice to see the franchise having a bright future.



pokoko said:
Dear god, this again? First off, what people were predicting on random internet forums does not matter. Like, at all. The people at WWS weren't sitting around going, "but they said it would do 3M by the end of the year on gamrConnect ... ." Second, anyone saying this was supposed to be a "big holiday title" are either fooling themselves or they're inflating expectations so they claim those lofty expectations weren't met. No one at WWS thought this was going to be the next Uncharted.

Before it even launched, I said that the purpose of this game was to build brand recognition for the series and to eventually be a base game for PS+. Not to be a huge individual sales machine. It's there to fill a need, to be Sony's party-type game. Not every investment should be judged solely on its own numbers. In business, sometimes you spend money on things to improve the whole of your production, not just to register an immediate return.

Sony is probably going to try to get this game into people's hands any way they can. PS+, giving it away with bundles, anything that will grow the player base, which will grow the franchise with regards to future installments.

I know there are some sad human beings out there who desperately want this series to die but, unfortunately for them, it's probably here to stay.

I like you.  You understand how to display logic and rationale.  have my babies?