Quantcast
Sweet list I found of ps3 2011 exclusives

Forums - Sony Discussion - Sweet list I found of ps3 2011 exclusives

d21lewis said:


Now I don't want to knock the PS3 or your belief of how superior it is to the 360 but you seem to be of the mindstate that it's so far beyond the 360 that it's ridiculous.  Your reasons behind this are that some exclusive A-List games designed by company A are superior to some multi-plat or  B-List game designed by company B.  I'm not sure that makes sense.  I mean, look at games like Gears of War 2, Halo 3, or Assassins Creed (multi-plat).  These are games that feature HUGE draw distances but at the same time look just as good (in my opinion, much better) than a game like inFamous--and featured TONS of NPC's running around with their own AI.  As for the 360 holding a game like FF13 back, it wasn't the best JRPG around (it's definitely no Lost Odyssey) but can you name any other JRPG that looks better?  How could the 360 be holding that game back if it's the best looking around?

Now it's a great thing for PS3 owners to have such great exclusives (although, I'm only interested in two or three of them, for sure) in 2011.  More games is definitely a good thing.  Dismissing a great game simply because it suddenly got announced on another platform despite the probability that it's the exact same game it would have been, otherwise (as far as we can prove) is just the wrong stance to have.  I've never played the Killzone series so that may be the one--but aside from Heavy Rain and God of War 3, there's nothing (not even Uncharted 2) that seemes to be a quantum leap beyond what we've already seen on the 360.  The two are closer in power than you want to admit.


How come? Heavy Rain doesn't look as good as Uncharted 2 from my experience, I wasn't even blown by Heavy Rain.

Uncharted 2 looked leaps above anything 360 has right now imo. Unless I am wrong gears of war 2 is the best looking 360 game I played(it looks better than ME 2,?) Either way, when you factor in AA of Uncharted 2 coupled with no screen tearing and  30 fps along with beautiful graphics (none of the other PS3 games do this, Heavy Rain doesn't, ME 2 doesn't, maybe God of War 3) I think UC 2 is unrivaled. 

KZ3 right now seems to look better than UC 2 and has 30 fps no screen tearing. That is supposed to be the best PS3 can do though, but we will see. It might be true because we are nearing the end of the gen anyway.

And a note to the other guy: Textures are better on the PS3 and its official. The graphic card on the PS3 can do better textures by default than 360, there's no involvement of the cell in this case. That's the only thing the PS3 graphics card can do better than the 360.

Draw distance I am not sure. Most games have better draw distance on the 360; but draw distance never made an impact on me that much.



Around the Network

d21lewis said:

Well, when you put it that way, how can I argue with you?  You win, man.


I hope to one day be worthy of even living in your shadow.



AussieGecko said:
Kratos said:

Give Medievil 3 this year Sony plz!!!!


This I agree with 110 percent. Thats right bitches above the possible reality is how much I want this and Ratchet and Clank!


*High Fives* Medievil has always been my favorite sony IP :D



PSN ID: clemens-nl                                                                                                                

mantlepiecek said:
d21lewis said:


Now I don't want to knock the PS3 or your belief of how superior it is to the 360 but you seem to be of the mindstate that it's so far beyond the 360 that it's ridiculous.  Your reasons behind this are that some exclusive A-List games designed by company A are superior to some multi-plat or  B-List game designed by company B.  I'm not sure that makes sense.  I mean, look at games like Gears of War 2, Halo 3, or Assassins Creed (multi-plat).  These are games that feature HUGE draw distances but at the same time look just as good (in my opinion, much better) than a game like inFamous--and featured TONS of NPC's running around with their own AI.  As for the 360 holding a game like FF13 back, it wasn't the best JRPG around (it's definitely no Lost Odyssey) but can you name any other JRPG that looks better?  How could the 360 be holding that game back if it's the best looking around?

Now it's a great thing for PS3 owners to have such great exclusives (although, I'm only interested in two or three of them, for sure) in 2011.  More games is definitely a good thing.  Dismissing a great game simply because it suddenly got announced on another platform despite the probability that it's the exact same game it would have been, otherwise (as far as we can prove) is just the wrong stance to have.  I've never played the Killzone series so that may be the one--but aside from Heavy Rain and God of War 3, there's nothing (not even Uncharted 2) that seemes to be a quantum leap beyond what we've already seen on the 360.  The two are closer in power than you want to admit.


How come? Heavy Rain doesn't look as good as Uncharted 2 from my experience, I wasn't even blown by Heavy Rain.

Don't want to disrupt you all's debate, but HR had quite a few things going for it, in an extreme way, that not many (if any) titles have kept up with, such as facial animation (Heavenly Sword was better during cutscenes, but HR did all facial animation in real time), character models, and indoor environments. I agree with D21 on one hand, the 360 has put up quite the fight, and while I'd argue that Killzone 2, Uncharted 2, HR, & God of War III all look better than the best from the 360, it's not something that rewarding outside of bragging rights.



                                                                                                                                            

CGI-Quality said:
mantlepiecek said:
d21lewis said:


Now I don't want to knock the PS3 or your belief of how superior it is to the 360 but you seem to be of the mindstate that it's so far beyond the 360 that it's ridiculous.  Your reasons behind this are that some exclusive A-List games designed by company A are superior to some multi-plat or  B-List game designed by company B.  I'm not sure that makes sense.  I mean, look at games like Gears of War 2, Halo 3, or Assassins Creed (multi-plat).  These are games that feature HUGE draw distances but at the same time look just as good (in my opinion, much better) than a game like inFamous--and featured TONS of NPC's running around with their own AI.  As for the 360 holding a game like FF13 back, it wasn't the best JRPG around (it's definitely no Lost Odyssey) but can you name any other JRPG that looks better?  How could the 360 be holding that game back if it's the best looking around?

Now it's a great thing for PS3 owners to have such great exclusives (although, I'm only interested in two or three of them, for sure) in 2011.  More games is definitely a good thing.  Dismissing a great game simply because it suddenly got announced on another platform despite the probability that it's the exact same game it would have been, otherwise (as far as we can prove) is just the wrong stance to have.  I've never played the Killzone series so that may be the one--but aside from Heavy Rain and God of War 3, there's nothing (not even Uncharted 2) that seemes to be a quantum leap beyond what we've already seen on the 360.  The two are closer in power than you want to admit.


How come? Heavy Rain doesn't look as good as Uncharted 2 from my experience, I wasn't even blown by Heavy Rain.

Don't want to disrupt you all's debate, but HR had quite a few things going for it, in an extreme way, that not many (if any) titles have kept up with, such as facial animation (Heavenly Sword was better during cutscenes, but HR did all facial animation in real time), character models, and indoor environments. I agree with D21 on one hand, the 360 has put up quite the fight, and while I'd argue that the Killzone 2, Uncharted 2, HR, & God of War III all look better than the best from the 360, it's not something that rewarding outside of bragging rights.

The debate was over before he posted, and better games are reward enough :P



Around the Network
Edgeoflife said:

The debate was over before he posted, and better games are reward enough :P

Eh...yeah, but that's subjective either way. The 360 has plenty to offer for a good case of claiming it's better than the PS3. Depends on who you talk to, how they game, and what their needs are.



                                                                                                                                            

CGI-Quality said:
Edgeoflife said:

The debate was over before he posted, and better games are reward enough :P

Eh...yeah, but that's subjective either way. The 360 has plenty to offer for a good case of claiming it's better than the PS3. Depends on who you talk to, how they game, and what their needs are.

They have a case in the shooter genre, but thats about it, 360 exclusives are few, far between and are usually shooters or not that good 



CGI-Quality said:
Edgeoflife said:

The debate was over before he posted, and better games are reward enough :P

Eh...yeah, but that's subjective either way. The 360 has plenty to offer for a good case of claiming it's better than the PS3. Depends on who you talk to, how they game, and what their needs are.


The 360 only owners case in 2011 is based on the fact that the 360 still has the multiplats and the superior multiplayer. I, myself would rather have more games on top of a great year of multiplats and great multiplayer. Xbox Live may be better than PSN, but PSN is free and is way better than it used to be in my changing eyes.



Some battles aren't worth fighting.  Besides, this isn't the place.  Good list, though.  I can't wait for inFamous 2 and Last Gaurdian!



Twitter: @d21lewis  --I'll add you if you add me!!

Sony needs more good exclusives, I loved my ps2 last Gen and had many more games for it than my xbox like the Onimusha and Devil May Cry series', and Resident Evil 4 (not really exclusive but not on xbox).  This Gen there's more games on xbox 360 that I want to play like Gears, Halo, Alan Wake, Mass Effect, and lots of others that are multiplat anyway like FF13.  My biggest reason for buying a console is the games, so this Gen I went with the 360, though I may still buy a ps3 if they come out with some more good exclusives.  Also interesting to see how much better Microsoft is doing this Gen since they got hammered last Gen by the ps2.  They stepped up their game, while it seems Sony has taken 3 steps back, at least sales wise so far.