http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=fr&tl=en&u=http://www.jeuxvideo.com/articles/0001/00013884-gran-turismo-5-test.htm

 wow

didnt expect this ...

PS : cant copy paste the review properly as always with google translate

 Edit : by the way FM3 got 17/20

EDIT2 : and prologue got ....... 15/20 LOL

shock!

"she prefers to penalize that give you a chance to transcend itself ..."

Can we just wait for the actual reviews tomorrow morning once the embargo is lifted?

I'm not defending it, as I really don't care, but I'd really like to see how this same group rates other games.  To give it a 75% (15/20) for graphics is absolutely insane for this game.  Also, how, after a 15, 14, 17, and 15 out of 20, does it get a final rating of 14?

I also think these critics are being extremely picky about literally everything in this game just because the expectations were so high.  These same problems in a call of duty game (once again, I don't care, I'm not even getting the game) likely result in all 17's and 18's or higher with an overall rating of 18 or 19.

I wasn't expecting that at all

"Polyphony has developed a game for GT fans and just for them."

This sentence explain the review... cof... the reviewer doesn't like Gran Turismo.

to all :

jeuxvideo.com is the most imporant website in term of traffic even if it is not the best one

but, I must say, this review become a joke when their start talking about the "bad" GT5 physics when it is actually superior to any other console racers ...

They haven't even played online yet.

Nice catch!  He fails to mention that there are millions of GT fans...the graphics isn't backed by enough considering the Prologue reviews said the graphics were simply amazing.  The rest of the stuff can be manipulated by whether or not the gameplay is enjoyed.