this is a hrrible game, no thnks.

WKC was a good game. Unfortunately many people didn't give it a proper chance because of the sluggish pace of the combat. I hope that the sequel improves on this aspect, as it's really the only thing I found slightly bad in the game.

Heck, the final parts of the SP story were awesome. Oh, and Kara FTW, it sucked what happened to her  

combat can be sluggish at times, but you get used to it. apart from that it has everything a jrpg usually has

*great grafix, sound and music

*good level up system and customisation

*good sized single player quest

*extra missions offline and online co-op

*build your own town, your own homepage etc

*massive overworlds, towns, dungeons

i think its brill but fell foul to poor reviews. im upto the flanders cave section and about 22 hours in so far, i will deffo purchase the sequel

its a bit on the easy side but still fun. looking at this overworld gameplay you can see the size of the thing.

i am just confused at how low the scores are

i can agree with the combat being slow , old school-like , but a lot of the cons are from the storyline.
i mean if you look at JRPGs this gen for example , Star Ocean had a terrible storyline and voice overs, Resonance of Fate had a very straight forward storyline , the reviewers however didn't give those as Cons and rated them higher than WKC.

its just a lot of people don't understand JRPGs made by Level 5 never had a deep and emotional storyline but rather the sense of adventure and charm that they do very well.

They should give you the 1000 hours of your life back as a reward lol

It would be a really cool prize if they didn't look so goofy. A good idea, but maybe next time work on making the crown/tiara actually fit the characters head.

becaus th stry seemed been ther dun tht, nthing was original about it and the chrcters sucked. atleast rof hd hints of originality evn if evntually the story wsnt tht good overall. There are only 2 jrpg this gen (on consoles) whch hve had a story/chrcters that have been praised by majority of reviewers they are valkyria chronicles & final fantasy xiii. Lsot oddessy's story & chrcters wer well recieved too genrally.

If the sequel improves and gets good reviews I might buy it.

thr u g

i bld th txt so u cn c it

ppl & critics r harsh. they want what they see gud in a game

why did mw2 get 90 +, why did cod:waw get 90 +

i dnt think eithr desereved o, they are rehashes of th same thing (wud a titanic rehash get gud reviews everytime?), then u have ff13 & lost oddessy get below 90 on metacritic. I get annoyed by tht too, but reviewers want sumthing this gen that jrpg's aren't giving them.