By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - IGN: MAG Review!

Ping_ii on 01 February 2010

Here's another 9/10 for M.A.G

http://playunwired.com/playstation/65-reviews/451-review-mag.html



Around the Network
fighter on 01 February 2010

GTA graphics are amazing not only from a technical point of view (zooming in and out of the city with the helicopter, the draw distance, the many caracters/ vehicles/ architectures on screen etc) but ALSO on the artistical point of view with the great atmosphere, lightings, colour palettes, designs etc.


Those who think it's overrated just need to compare it to other sandbox games and their "opinion" will soon become regret.



Seraphic_Sixaxis on 01 February 2010

As expected, i expect WKC: IE to be higher then this from IGN.



Thechalkblock on 01 February 2010

I'm questioning the legitimacy of these reviews honestly. The game allows 256 players, of course it won't be perfect upon release. I think it's very possible this game will be a lot better than a big reviewer's 7.



dsister44 on 01 February 2010
Thechalkblock said:
I'm questioning the legitimacy of these reviews honestly. The game allows 256 players, of course it won't be perfect upon release. I think it's very possible this game will be a lot better than a big reviewer's 7.

So what are you saying? That they shouldn't review the game at all. Or that they should give it a ten because it might get better



Around the Network
txrattlesnake on 01 February 2010

It seems like a lot of people want to make GTA IV their whipping boy for some reason.

It's graphics were much better than in III, VC, and SA. And they were up their with Gears of War I, never seen such great hype for a game that was primarily grainy black and white, and Uncharted I which were supposed to be the games with the best graphics at its time of release.

So, yes, GTA IV deserved high marks for graphics.

I believe MAG scored higher than the last SOCOM, so not bad.



chocoloco on 01 February 2010

Wow that is harsh. I don't agree with the reviewers at all. It is at least an 8.5 and the graphics suck on my old tube yet it still it looks good on my new HD.



Thechalkblock on 01 February 2010
dsister44 said:
Thechalkblock said:
I'm questioning the legitimacy of these reviews honestly. The game allows 256 players, of course it won't be perfect upon release. I think it's very possible this game will be a lot better than a big reviewer's 7.

So what are you saying? That they shouldn't review the game at all. Or that they should give it a ten because it might get better

Neither. I'm saying reviews for this game might be even more pointless than reviews usually are. Don't get me wrong, I could care less about this game; it isn't my type of thing. The situation the game's in is just a prime example of the lack of game review credibility.



twesterm on 01 February 2010
Boutros said:
The graphics score is not really justified. They gave GTAIV 10/10 for graphics and they were not good at all but when you consider the scale of the world it was impressive.
Isn't it the same thing with MAG?

So because one game was vastly overrated, all games should be?



 

twesterm on 01 February 2010
Thechalkblock said:
dsister44 said:
Thechalkblock said:
I'm questioning the legitimacy of these reviews honestly. The game allows 256 players, of course it won't be perfect upon release. I think it's very possible this game will be a lot better than a big reviewer's 7.

So what are you saying? That they shouldn't review the game at all. Or that they should give it a ten because it might get better

Neither. I'm saying reviews for this game might be even more pointless than reviews usually are. Don't get me wrong, I could care less about this game; it isn't my type of thing. The situation the game's in is just a prime example of the lack of game review credibility.

Did you actually read the review?  They actually talk about how they had to wait a week so they could review the game because they didn't want to base their review on the beta and wanted to wait on being able to play the actual game with actual people with the servers open.

I don't really get your reasoning for not trusting the review.