By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Final Fantasy XIII Xbox 360 Graphics "Inferior to PS3?

haxxiy on 31 January 2010

Dude, what a crapstorm for X360 FFXIII today. First no WW release confirmed and now this.



 

 

 

 

 

Around the Network
Ajescent on 31 January 2010
Ajescent said:
I guess I can understand why people seem shocked by this they are usually shocked when ps3 ports are graphically inferior to the 360 originals so I guess it's expected when it's the other way around ¬_¬ morons...

 



PS One/2/p/3slim/Vita owner. I survived the Apocalyps3/Collaps3 and all I got was this lousy signature.


Xbox One: What are you doing Dave?

Kudistos Megistos on 31 January 2010

There will be butthurt over this. It's just a pity the news didn't come out until after the hardware readjustments



CommonMan on 31 January 2010

Is this satisfactory to all the nutz and their"dumbed down" conspiacy theories? Your precious ps3 version looks better (I was always going to buy the ps3 version, but people were really getting crazy about that)



No one in the world ever gets what they want, and that is beautiful.

Seraphic_Sixaxis on 31 January 2010

Pfft, did it really matter in the first place? what does a "slight" graphical change mean anyway? its frame-rate, content, and gameplay that matters most anyway.



Around the Network
slowmo on 31 January 2010
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
Pfft, did it really matter in the first place? what does a "slight" graphical change mean anyway? its frame-rate, content, and gameplay that matters most anyway.


No graphics are more important than gameplay this generation, thats why the Wii is in last place struggling to keep up in sales with the sheer power of the HD consoles.

Thanks for the article OP but I'll wait for the Lens Of Truth comparison where we get some actual details of differences to find out what they've done differently between the two.  Nice to hear that for those picking this up on 360 its a good enough port though.

 

 

disclaimer: Its a joke about the Wii being in last place, please don't take it to heart



Seraphic_Sixaxis on 31 January 2010
slowmo said:
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
Pfft, did it really matter in the first place? what does a "slight" graphical change mean anyway? its frame-rate, content, and gameplay that matters most anyway.


No graphics are more important than gameplay this generation, thats why the Wii is in last place struggling to keep up in sales with the sheer power of the HD consoles.

Thanks for the article OP but I'll wait for the Lens Of Truth comparison where we get some actual details of differences to find out what they've done differently between the two.  Nice to hear that for those picking this up on 360 its a good enough port though.

You realize... i was defending the 360 right?

Anyway, i do agree, graphics do matter alot more then ever this gen, however there not number 1 on the list, it goes hand-in-hand, without one or the other, well...



DarthRat on 31 January 2010

Who cares? It's the still exactly the same game! I bought a 360 when FF was confirmed to be coming to it and the game is exactly the same apart from some slight difference in graphics! Considering I'm a big fan of retro games that means nothing to me!



slowmo on 31 January 2010
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
slowmo said:
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
Pfft, did it really matter in the first place? what does a "slight" graphical change mean anyway? its frame-rate, content, and gameplay that matters most anyway.


No graphics are more important than gameplay this generation, thats why the Wii is in last place struggling to keep up in sales with the sheer power of the HD consoles.

Thanks for the article OP but I'll wait for the Lens Of Truth comparison where we get some actual details of differences to find out what they've done differently between the two.  Nice to hear that for those picking this up on 360 its a good enough port though.

You realize... i was defending the 360 right?

Anyway, i do agree, graphics do matter alot more then ever this gen, however there not number 1 on the list, it goes hand-in-hand, without one or the other, well...


I was being sarcastic but should have added "/sarcasm" or a smilie.  I was actually agreeing with you but worded it terribly.  I didn't pick you out for having a go at the 360 lol.  I think looking even now that saying the Wii was in last place might have been a clue I was joking around though



Seraphic_Sixaxis on 31 January 2010
slowmo said:
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
slowmo said:
Seraphic_Sixaxis said:
Pfft, did it really matter in the first place? what does a "slight" graphical change mean anyway? its frame-rate, content, and gameplay that matters most anyway.


No graphics are more important than gameplay this generation, thats why the Wii is in last place struggling to keep up in sales with the sheer power of the HD consoles.

Thanks for the article OP but I'll wait for the Lens Of Truth comparison where we get some actual details of differences to find out what they've done differently between the two.  Nice to hear that for those picking this up on 360 its a good enough port though.

You realize... i was defending the 360 right?

Anyway, i do agree, graphics do matter alot more then ever this gen, however there not number 1 on the list, it goes hand-in-hand, without one or the other, well...


I was being sarcastic but should have added "/sarcasm" or a smilie.  I was actually agreeing with you but worded it terribly.  I didn't pick you out for having a go at the 360 lol.  I think looking even now that saying the Wii was in last place might have been a clue I was joking around though

lol, well your a brave guy, im not sure such jokes with the wii are taken so lightly around here, i'd edit that part out just to be on the safe side there friend.