By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Poll: Which team wins Super Bowl XLIV?

 

Poll: Which team wins Super Bowl XLIV?

Indianapolis Colts 29 40.28%
 
New Orleans Saints 43 59.72%
 
Total:72
SaviorX on 26 January 2010
oldschoolfool said:
I don't care who wins. I'm not really a fan of either team. Cowboys baby!!!!!!! lol

LOL You Cowboys fans make me laugh sometimes.....



Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. "  thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."

Around the Network
Sephiroth357 on 26 January 2010
outlawauron said:
Retrasado said:
Sephiroth357 said:
Retrasado said:
2) The Saints' pass defense is ranked 26th in the league. This is not a good thing for ANY team going into the Superbowl, let alone if you are playing Peyton Manning. If you want proof of how much trouble the Saints are going to have trying to defend the Colt's passing game, consider this. Except for a (typical) slow start on Sunday, Manning simply decimated the Jet's pass defense torching them for 377 yards and 3 TDs with no interceptions. And the Jet's pass defense is ranked #1 IN THE ENTIRE NFL. Now imagine what he can do when he plays the 26th ranked defense...

3) The Colts won't turn the ball over 5 times. They don't run the ball enough to give teams a decent shot at making someone cough one up and if you do manage to get them to do that they just go back to the passing game. And Manning doesn't throw very many interceptions. This year he only had 16. Now, granted, the Saints aren't going to do this either and Brees actually threw less INTs than Manning this year (11), but given that even with those five turnovers, the Saints had to take the game into overtime and kick a field goal to beat them doesn't bode well for their chances of winning without getting all those freebies. Heck, they STILL might have lost if the Vikings hadn't given them a free first down to keep them from going 3-and-out in OT...

Point 2 is well spoken of.

Favre only had 7, lol.

-He managed to throw 2 during the Saints game.

heh. yeah, but he also had better protection, waaay better receivers, and way, way, way, WAAY better running backs than either Brees or especially Manning, so I didn't think that would be a fair comparison. You do have a very good point though

Come on now, the Saints and Colts receivers are better than that. Harvin, Rice, and Berrian is one hell of a tandem, but the Saints has quite a group of receivers themselves.

What RB is better than All day?




outlawauron on 26 January 2010
Sephiroth357 said:
outlawauron said:
Retrasado said:
Sephiroth357 said:
Retrasado said:
2) The Saints' pass defense is ranked 26th in the league. This is not a good thing for ANY team going into the Superbowl, let alone if you are playing Peyton Manning. If you want proof of how much trouble the Saints are going to have trying to defend the Colt's passing game, consider this. Except for a (typical) slow start on Sunday, Manning simply decimated the Jet's pass defense torching them for 377 yards and 3 TDs with no interceptions. And the Jet's pass defense is ranked #1 IN THE ENTIRE NFL. Now imagine what he can do when he plays the 26th ranked defense...

3) The Colts won't turn the ball over 5 times. They don't run the ball enough to give teams a decent shot at making someone cough one up and if you do manage to get them to do that they just go back to the passing game. And Manning doesn't throw very many interceptions. This year he only had 16. Now, granted, the Saints aren't going to do this either and Brees actually threw less INTs than Manning this year (11), but given that even with those five turnovers, the Saints had to take the game into overtime and kick a field goal to beat them doesn't bode well for their chances of winning without getting all those freebies. Heck, they STILL might have lost if the Vikings hadn't given them a free first down to keep them from going 3-and-out in OT...

Point 2 is well spoken of.

Favre only had 7, lol.

-He managed to throw 2 during the Saints game.

heh. yeah, but he also had better protection, waaay better receivers, and way, way, way, WAAY better running backs than either Brees or especially Manning, so I didn't think that would be a fair comparison. You do have a very good point though

Come on now, the Saints and Colts receivers are better than that. Harvin, Rice, and Berrian is one hell of a tandem, but the Saints has quite a group of receivers themselves.

What RB is better than All day?

I didn't mention anything about running backs.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Onyxmeth on 26 January 2010
Sephiroth357 said:

What RB is better than All day?

Chris Johnson without a doubt. Maybe Maurice Jones Drew. Ray Rice is far better as a duel threat, but he's not a better traditional back.



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



Sephiroth357 on 26 January 2010
outlawauron said:
Sephiroth357 said:
outlawauron said:
Retrasado said:
Sephiroth357 said:
Retrasado said:
2) The Saints' pass defense is ranked 26th in the league. This is not a good thing for ANY team going into the Superbowl, let alone if you are playing Peyton Manning. If you want proof of how much trouble the Saints are going to have trying to defend the Colt's passing game, consider this. Except for a (typical) slow start on Sunday, Manning simply decimated the Jet's pass defense torching them for 377 yards and 3 TDs with no interceptions. And the Jet's pass defense is ranked #1 IN THE ENTIRE NFL. Now imagine what he can do when he plays the 26th ranked defense...

3) The Colts won't turn the ball over 5 times. They don't run the ball enough to give teams a decent shot at making someone cough one up and if you do manage to get them to do that they just go back to the passing game. And Manning doesn't throw very many interceptions. This year he only had 16. Now, granted, the Saints aren't going to do this either and Brees actually threw less INTs than Manning this year (11), but given that even with those five turnovers, the Saints had to take the game into overtime and kick a field goal to beat them doesn't bode well for their chances of winning without getting all those freebies. Heck, they STILL might have lost if the Vikings hadn't given them a free first down to keep them from going 3-and-out in OT...

Point 2 is well spoken of.

Favre only had 7, lol.

-He managed to throw 2 during the Saints game.

heh. yeah, but he also had better protection, waaay better receivers, and way, way, way, WAAY better running backs than either Brees or especially Manning, so I didn't think that would be a fair comparison. You do have a very good point though

Come on now, the Saints and Colts receivers are better than that. Harvin, Rice, and Berrian is one hell of a tandem, but the Saints has quite a group of receivers themselves.

What RB is better than All day?

I didn't mention anything about running backs.

I must be seeing things.




Around the Network
Sephiroth357 on 26 January 2010
Onyxmeth said:
Sephiroth357 said:

What RB is better than All day?

Chris Johnson without a doubt. Maybe Maurice Jones Drew. Ray Rice is far better as a duel threat, but he's not a better traditional back.

The Vikings consist of multiple offensive threats. Titans? Not so much.

Sure, stats wise he's better, but put A.P is the better player.

Chris Johnson has a good year, a better one than A.P no doubt.

But, I repeat, Petterson is still the better player overall.

 

Chris Johnson and A.P remind me of Kobe and LeBron.




Kasz216 on 26 January 2010
Sephiroth357 said:
Onyxmeth said:
Sephiroth357 said:

What RB is better than All day?

Chris Johnson without a doubt. Maybe Maurice Jones Drew. Ray Rice is far better as a duel threat, but he's not a better traditional back.

The Vikings consist of multiple offensive threats. Titans? Not so much.

Sure, stats wise he's better, but put A.P is the better player.

Chris Johnson has had a good year, a better one than A.P no doubt.

But, I repeat, Petterson is still the better player overall.

Dude... it's not even close.

Chris Johnson is WAY better then Adrian Peterson.

Chris Johnson is like the new Barry Sanders.

Guy had more 40+ rushes in ONE SEASON.... then any other runningback in a year.

He also had more 85+ Rushes for TDs in a season then anyone has had... in their career.


This is something AP could not do.



Onyxmeth on 26 January 2010
Sephiroth357 said:
Onyxmeth said:
Sephiroth357 said:

What RB is better than All day?

Chris Johnson without a doubt. Maybe Maurice Jones Drew. Ray Rice is far better as a duel threat, but he's not a better traditional back.

The Vikings consist of multiple offensive threats. Titans? Not so much.

Sure, stats wise he's better, but put A.P is the better player.

Chris Johnson has a good year, a better one than A.P no doubt.

But, I repeat, Petterson is still the better player overall.

 

Chris Johnson and A.P remind me of Kobe and LeBron.

Results are all that matters. Chris Johnson has results. Peterson has speculation based on media hype. Peterson was thought to be better before he ever earned it. Chris Johnson had to prove he was better and still gets questioned. I'm not saying All Day isn't top 5, because he is, but he is no Chris Johnson.

Go look at Kasz's post for the rest. CJ is a unique talent and he does all he does without fumbling the ball 10 times a year.



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



Khuutra on 26 January 2010

Saints will win.

Because I want them to, you see.



Sephiroth357 on 26 January 2010
Kasz216 said:
Sephiroth357 said:
Onyxmeth said:
Sephiroth357 said:

What RB is better than All day?

Chris Johnson without a doubt. Maybe Maurice Jones Drew. Ray Rice is far better as a duel threat, but he's not a better traditional back.

The Vikings consist of multiple offensive threats. Titans? Not so much.

Sure, stats wise he's better, but put A.P is the better player.

Chris Johnson has had a good year, a better one than A.P no doubt.

But, I repeat, Petterson is still the better player overall.

Dude... it's not even close.

Chris Johnson is WAY better then Adrian Peterson.

Chris Johnson is like the new Barry Sanders.

Guy had more 40+ rushes in ONE SEASON.... then any other runningback in a year.

He also had more 85+ Rushes for TDs in a season then anyone has had... in their career.


This is something AP could not do.

--Going by statistics Wilt is better than Jordan, but many would disagree.

 

But nonetheless, I have to agree with you. C.J is the better RB after checking him on yahoo.