I guess it just means you're not representative of the typical Wii user..

"yep it's a well known fact that the lower your userbase the more million sellers you have."

I didn't write that, or even imply that. You can't make userbase suddenly matter in general by twisting my words.

And developing for a lesser powered system would make this better how? And why shouldn't you have a vision for your game exactly? And why should your vision be simplified for a lack of hardware power? And also pointing at games like Batman, or Assassin's creed 2, or any of the great games that came out last year and saying "They only cared about making the flashiest game possible" is really a gross disservice and insult to all of the people that put their passion and souls into making those games. Making venice seem less alive, reducing the activity in the streets, simplifying the ai routines of all the people living their lives, greatly reducing the draw distances from vistas would severely hamper the artistic integrity of that game.

Every generation of developers who under different circumstances you would call creative, sat around thinking "I want to do this, but can't because of the limitations of the hardware, I guess I will do this instead."  Super Mario World wasn't just flashier than Super Mario Bros 3, Ocarina of Time wasn't just flashier than Link to the Past, Pikmin wasn't something that would come to life in the same way on the N64, and games like Dead Space or Fallout 3 aren't just "flashier" games that should be scaled back for wii, or be sacrificed all together so they can focus on making more Jillian Michaels Fitness Ultimatum 2. How exactly was the original Modern Warfare focusing less on the actual game part? With an incredibly balanced intricate multiplayer that has influenced pretty much all online multiplayer games since? How is demon souls not an incrediblely creative unique game? How is Kamiya different from Suda other than having a bit more money to spend?

I love my wii, but trying to say that the games on HD systems are all flash and no substance, all tech and no creativity is insanity. Telling developers that they are dumb for not scaling things back a bit for wii because there are things they want to do but can't on the wii is an absurdity. If you really believe that it is wrong or stupid for a developer to want more horsepower, then you need to go back in time and slap Miyamoto and all your heroes in the face for at one point or another wishing they had a bit more processor power, or a bit of extra ram to achieve the game they really wanted to make.

Square had to lay down people on two occasions this gen but like I said even though it may not be FFXIII's fault, their crystal engine may have been the main factor, along with other things:(

I wish them all good luck...

of course on the 360 of those million sellers 2 are dead rising for some reason, around a dozen are annual sports games, and about 8 were pack ins
where as on the wii 0 are dead rising, 4 annual sports games, and 1 pack in which is a million seller anyway, and more missing others data

How many does PS2 have?

220

"And developing for a lesser powered system would make this better how?"

It would lower costs, and even help them learn to economize their HD games better.

I find it ironic that the games that no one seems to want to play on the 75m sellers list are actually paying for the overhyped bilge teh hardcores are spoon fed on a daily basis.

Exactly and yet they still complain...