You're a big enough 360 gamer to put up with 2 RRoDs, yet you never listed a 360 game on your profile, but took the time to list 250+ not-360 games?

Okay.  I guess you're the uh... anecdotal majority in your own post.

After going through all Nes games, Snes games, the few pc games xbox games i got tired of adding every game one by one it takes forever to go through them all, ive been gaming since game & watch, vectrex, nes era and i have or have had every console except ps3, ds and psp so i decided to add the rest when it´s made alot easier to add games or when i am very bored one day.

Edit: ive never had a Sega console (except for their portable) either but never needed too since i swapped consoles with friends back then and got to play most of the games worth playing anyway.

I don't think this will mean much to other publishers as Call of Duty is such a huge franchise. I doubt it will encourage sega to publish the conduit 2 for instance (or other 'hardcore' games). Though I think it's safe to say the next call of duty game will come to the wii, along with modern warfare 2 at some point in time.

I guess to a certain extent it's good for wii owners craving some of the games that the 360/ps3 get but I'd argue rather than talking about how well/poorly 'hardcore' games do on the wii, and whether such games will continue to make an appearance on the wii is...well pointless.

How do you shift what you don't have?

I agree that teens and early undergraduate students play in a non-casual casual way. They have more free time, but I can assure you they will only know the big games and will perhaps buy a handful of games. This is the traditional casual gamer market. i.e. They don't game as a hobby.

I'm happy with the games coming out over the next year, so I'm not fussed if big 'core' games come or not. I'm happy with my niche core and occasional franchise games and nintendo numbers.

On a side note, is there a thread in the website section about making adding games more intuitive?

not that i know of, it could sure need some update to that feature

I love my 360, maybe even more than my Wii, but I still prefer to play my shooters on the Wii by far. Dual analog is "ok" wheras Wii controls are amazing for shooters (if done right, ofcourse).

I have a PS3 and I still chose to buy the Wii version of CoD:W@W. The Wii feels more natural to play games in first person view than the PS3, as I feel my actions with the Wii remote are closer to the character's compared with the dualshock. In some games, such as Bioshock, I enjoyed the graphics and the story, but felt detached from the main character, which is never good. In the other hand, I have not problem with the dual nipples in third person view games, as it feels as I am playing with some puppets. Graphics are an important part of the game, but I think the graphics in the Wii are functional enough to provide me immersion. The same thing I can't say about the PS3's controller.

Sounds more like an excuse than an actual explanation especially since that was 2008 when people were buying GTA4, LBP, Resistance 2, and MGS4 on the PS3... so much for the movie buffs :P

@your comments about MW Wii vs MW 360/PS3, put it like this, I've owned the game spanning 360, PC, and Wii, the only version superior to the Wii version would be the PC version, the only things the Wii version lacks is local multi (which isn't even in the PC version either and they added squadmate mode) and the lack of the DLC maps.  But the Wii controls are miles ahead of the 360 version and would be the console version of choice, so unless the PS3 and 360 game sprouts a mouse and keyboard and some mod support, this is a no brainer, people like good controls in FPS games.