By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Do You Think Many People went from PS2 to Wii?

 

Do You Think Many People went from PS2 to Wii?

Yes, exclusively! 53 32.52%
 
No, at least not exclusively. 60 36.81%
 
No, most went to PS3/360 instead. 50 30.67%
 
Total:163

The casual audience definitely went from PS2 to Wii, and as the PS2 slowly rides off into the sunset, the Wii will continue to capture the vast majority of current PS2 owners, especially the late adopters who picked up the PS2 Slim.



On 2/24/13, MB1025 said:
You know I was always wondering why no one ever used the dollar sign for $ony, but then I realized they have no money so it would be pointless.

Around the Network
Nick said:
PS2 had so many games that it appealed to almost all gamers. 360 and PS3 are not in the same situation, and neither is the Wii. I think they are splitting the PS2's user base.

A lot of people want to forget or dismiss the fact that a lot of the PS2 library and user base was "casual". I suppose it's because that word wasn't used to scorn those gamers the way it is used by elitists now.

 

Statement of the year!



 

 

        Wii FC: 6440 8298 7583 0720   XBOX GT: WICK1978               PSN: its_the_wick   3DS: 1676-3747-7846                                          Nintendo Network: its-the-wick

Systems I've owned: Atari 2600, NES, SNES, GBColor, N64, Gamecube, PS2, Xbox, GBAdvance, DSlite, PSP, Wii, Xbox360, PS3, 3DS, PSVita, PS4, 3DS XL, Wii U

The best quote I've seen this year:

Angelus said: I'm a moron

Some people did, but it wasn't exclusive.

To be honest the girls I know that had PS2's got Wii for the most part and the guys got 360's.



i already know 2 people that owned a GC last gen and now they are XBOX360 gamers!!!



I think alot of people bought the Wii, after the PS2, but then decided to buy a 360 or PS3 because of content.



“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.

Around the Network
c0rd said:
Mr. sickVisionz said:
I say no. I don't think that the Gamecube inspired many PS2 owners to go with Nintendo the next time around.

Uh, what? That isn't how it works.

People buy the Wii (or any console) for what it is, not for what it succeeded. This is the case for most people, whether they had a PS2 or not.

I think the past affects people more than you give it credit for.  We aren't talking about new gamers, this thread is about old gamers who were gaming for prior gens.  A lot of people had moajor complaints about the Gamecube.  I don't think anything about the Wii suggestsed that those complaints had been addressed.  When you saw that the Gamecube had lack luster 3rd party support and the vast majority of AAA games weren't M rated (I don't see this as a flaw, but a good number of people do) and Nintendo franchises basically made up the entire good games list... If you had issues with that, there was nothing about the Wii pre-launch that seemed like it fixed that.

I think a lot of people bought a 360 becaue they loved the xbox and decided to stick with MS.  I think a lot of people went with a PS3 becuase they loved the PS2 and decided to stick with Sony.  I think a lot of people loved the Gamecube and decided to stick with Nintendo the next time.

Like I said before, I think the past has a lot more weight than you give it credit for.  If anything, I think it's rare for someone to go in with a clean slate every gen and totally ignore their past experiences.



I only ignore previous gen when the current gen doesn't have BC. That effects my choice more than if I had the previous gen or not.



Mr. sickVisionz said:
c0rd said:
Mr. sickVisionz said:
I say no. I don't think that the Gamecube inspired many PS2 owners to go with Nintendo the next time around.

Uh, what? That isn't how it works.

People buy the Wii (or any console) for what it is, not for what it succeeded. This is the case for most people, whether they had a PS2 or not.

I think the past affects people more than you give it credit for.  We aren't talking about new gamers, this thread is about old gamers who were gaming for prior gens.  A lot of people had moajor complaints about the Gamecube.  I don't think anything about the Wii suggestsed that those complaints had been addressed.  When you saw that the Gamecube had lack luster 3rd party support and the vast majority of AAA games weren't M rated (I don't see this as a flaw, but a good number of people do) and Nintendo franchises basically made up the entire good games list... If you had issues with that, there was nothing about the Wii pre-launch that seemed like it fixed that.

I think a lot of people bought a 360 becaue they loved the xbox and decided to stick with MS.  I think a lot of people went with a PS3 becuase they loved the PS2 and decided to stick with Sony.  I think a lot of people loved the Gamecube and decided to stick with Nintendo the next time.

Like I said before, I think the past has a lot more weight than you give it credit for.  If anything, I think it's rare for someone to go in with a clean slate every gen and totally ignore their past experiences.

I know that the past plays a role, it's about the brand. PS1 to PS2 was a clean switch for everyone, as people already knew what it was.

However, GC to Wii is norhing of the sort. This is not "GC2" we're talking about here. Nintendo's marketing completely changed, and it's likely most people that bought the PS2 don't even know that the Wii succeeds the GC, hell, they may not even know what the GC is!

The last statement may be exaggerated, but I think you assume most people are more informed than they are in reality. While those with an Xbox or GC were probably more aware of what kind of gaming is out there, many people that had a PS2 basically had the only console that mattered (it was the only mainstream console).



Carl2291 said:
Nope.

I think most are split between 360 and PS3. And a whole lot more are about to start upgrading to PS3's too in the next year.

The Wii has opened up a whole new market. Most of the sales are from that market.

Its fun to dream carl, but its morning, and its time to wake up What you're assuming is unlikely, as the Wii base has grown far faster than the PS2 base

 

Predictions:Sales of Wii Fit will surpass the combined sales of the Grand Theft Auto franchiseLifetime sales of Wii will surpass the combined sales of the entire Playstation family of consoles by 12/31/2015 Wii hardware sales will surpass the total hardware sales of the PS2 by 12/31/2010 Wii will have 50% marketshare or more by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!!  It was a little over 48% only)Wii will surpass 45 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!!  Nintendo Financials showed it fell slightly short of 45 million shipped by end of 2008)Wii will surpass 80 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2009 (I was wrong!! Wii didn't even get to 70 Million)

It depends on the type of PS2 gamer. I was rooting for the Wii at the start of the gen because I felt that the PS3 and to a lesser extent the Xbox 360 were alienating gamers with their pricing. $500-$600 for a console is ridiculous and while the 360's $300 core model was a reasonable launch price, I felt that the selling point of the Xbox 360 was the "Next Gen experience" (HD, online play and downloadable content) and with the $300 Core not having HD cables, a headset or a hard drive, it was reasonably priced but didn't offer the "Next Gen" experience that we were craving for. I felt the $400 Premium was a bit too expensive (if you adjust for inflation, the PS2's $300 in 2000 is equal to around $340 in 2005. So I felt $400 at launch was excessive for a console. And the PS3, even moreso obviously) and I resented that the 360 bumped games to $60 a pop.

But after seeing the Wii distance itself from the type of gaming I grew up with by replacing the gamepad with the motion controls almost entirely and seeing that all the big third-party titles were going to the Xbox 360 and PS3, I couldn't justify getting a Wii. So I waited it out and saw the 360 go down to $300 and got it.

Yes the Wii has some great third-party titles but it's not that good for third-party games I grew up with. For sports games, advantage Ps360 (unless you want to count the more fun Tiger Woods port and Wii sports). For action games, advantage Ps360. For jrpgs, the Wii took forever to get that ball rolling (and the DS blows everyone, including the Wii, out of the water in that category). For wrpgs, advantage Ps360. For fighters, advantage Ps360.

I wouldn't rule out getting a Wii eventually (for stuff like NMH2, Madworld, Muramasa, Brawl, Mario Kart, etc.) but it's definitely not a #1 choice console to me. Even though the Wii exclusives have lower metacritic ratings, I'm leaning more towards a Wii rather than a PS3 since there's a lot of overlap between PS3 and 360 and I already have a 360. I'm not crazy for AAA blockbuster stuff. Something like NMH2 appeals to me more than Uncharted 2. As crazy as it sounds. But I'm just like that. It's the same reason way how I prefer stuff like Taxi Driver (Travis Touchdown is a lot like a modern Travis Bickle if you think about it) to The Dark Knight. I don't buy into the hype trains.