| Akvod said: If you consider it a "bigger" sin to kill a 3'rd party than oneself, then it'll be a more... utilitarian... nah that's greatest utility and hapiness... Well my point is that people usually have a concept of "worse" sins. It is worse to kill 5 people than 1, ignoring utility. If it is considered worse to kill somebody else than oneself, then it'll be a better choice to kill oneself. However, that does not necessarily mean that the suicide is not morally wrong. You still "stain your soul", just not as much if you did the alternative. So it's like saying if it is a mortal sin to fuck a babyl, if the alternative is to kill the whole world. Sure, it's worse to kill the whole world, but it's still wrong to fuck a baby. If it's a matter of accountability, that's an issue of free will. Did you have any choice? Most people will say no I think... fuck I'm rambling, I fucking hate philosophy.... *taps legs because of Red Bull* Anyone want to prove the existence of an external world (as we perceive it) with me? |
Is is Utilitarian Calculus where you add up the amount of happiness? It's been a while since any of my philosophy classes...anyways...
You could say that whether you're a zombie or not, the world is shit. One more zombie isn't going to make it more shitty so you aren't likely to really take away from anyone's happiness.
And it would not be ignoring utitlity saying it's worse to kill 5 people instead of 1. In one case you make 5 people happy, in the other you make 1 happy.









