Boutros said:
Khuutra said:
Boutros said:
Why would I be wrong? You are as wrong as I am lol
And I didn't say that gathering together a lot of opinions makes them objective. I said it makes them more objective as a whole.
My objective/subjective meter:
Subjective |1 opinion----------------2 opinions---------------------------------100 opinions-----------------------------1000 opinions-------------| Objective
But it will never reach the perfect objectivity.
That's how I see it.
|
Yes, but you're wrong, because a collection of subjective opinions does not make them objective, it just makes the statement of the fact of those opinions objective, but if that's the case then the statement of any opinions is objctive, i.e. "my game of 2006 is Wii Sports" is an objective statement about my own opinions, but my opinions are still subjective.
No, I am not wrong in this case, it's a simple fact of the necessary difference between subjectivity and objectivity.
|
But the thing is that I agree with pretty much everything you've said but when I read your posts, I don't see what makes the things I've said wrong.
Tell me, what would you do if someone (from a prestigious webiste or magazine) asks you to make a top 10 Wii games?
Would you base this top 10 on your opinion alone?
|
I get what you mean, but trying to make a list that by your terms would be more "objective" is simply creating a list that you know most people will agree with you, its still subjective, its just not answering the question: "your top ten" but answering "what is the top ten list of most people".
Going by what most people think isnt objective, there may be objective measures of certain aspects of games, music, movies but the way we assign importance to those objective measures is subjective.