By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dsister44 on 22 November 2009
ChrisIsNotSexy said:
Garnett said:

Oh, does it matter, Xbox had LESS failure rate than PS2, oh and Chrisisnotsexy, If Sony did moneyhatt devs last gen, the library might of been different.

 

Wrong.

Developers made games for the PS2 because:

1.PS1 dominated it's generation.

2.PS2 dominated it's generation.

Why?Because of all those amazing franchises that Sony helped to be built in all these years.

Sony never payed to have an exclusive title on their console.

Their console was just so succeful the developers choosed it.

More like MS paying off Square Enix to have FF XIII on 360.

More like MS paying off Activision to have timed exclusive DLC.

Any proof of this? I would like a link supporting it                                                                                                                                                

Again, give me a link 

 

Links!!!  



Around the Network
ChrisIsNotSexy on 22 November 2009
dsister44 said:
ChrisIsNotSexy said:
Garnett said:

Oh, does it matter, Xbox had LESS failure rate than PS2, oh and Chrisisnotsexy, If Sony did moneyhatt devs last gen, the library might of been different.

 

Wrong.

Developers made games for the PS2 because:

1.PS1 dominated it's generation.

2.PS2 dominated it's generation.

Why?Because of all those amazing franchises that Sony helped to be built in all these years.

Sony never payed to have an exclusive title on their console.

Their console was just so succeful the developers choosed it.

More like MS paying off Square Enix to have FF XIII on 360.

More like MS paying off Activision to have timed exclusive DLC.

Any proof of this? I would like a link supporting it                                                                                                                                                

Again, give me a link 

 

Links!!!  

Im talking about this generation on the first.

The other 2 are simply for no-brainers.

Why would Activision give MS timed exclusive DLC without any profit?

FF XIII wont sell too much on the 360,if it would,they would also bring FFXIV, and FF XIII Versus to it.



letsdance on 22 November 2009
kowenicki said:
@letsdance

why dont you have a ps3 and games?


Read my post history. It might help you find out.



letsdance on 22 November 2009
Garnett said:

Yeah devs decided not to suppot the most powerful gaming console out at the time, which was the Xbox, but they start now with the PS3?

 

BS. Sony paid R* to keep GTA a timed exclusive to the PS brand.

 

@Chris

 

No Sony actually admitted they did pay for exclusives the last 2 gens, they said this gen there not buying them.


Its called the ps1 and ps2

Logic fails again.



dsister44 on 22 November 2009
ChrisIsNotSexy said:
dsister44 said:
ChrisIsNotSexy said:

Wrong.

Developers made games for the PS2 because:

1.PS1 dominated it's generation.

2.PS2 dominated it's generation.

Why?Because of all those amazing franchises that Sony helped to be built in all these years.

Sony never payed to have an exclusive title on their console.

Their console was just so succeful the developers choosed it.

More like MS paying off Square Enix to have FF XIII on 360.

More like MS paying off Activision to have timed exclusive DLC.

Any proof of this? I would like a link supporting it                                                                                                                                                

Again, give me a link 

 

Links!!!  

Im talking about this generation on the first.

The other 2 are simply for no-brainers.

Why would Activision give MS timed exclusive DLC without any profit?

FF XIII wont sell too much on the 360,if it would,they would also bring FFXIV, and FF XIII Versus to it.

They payed for the exclusive Batman DLC                                                                                                                                                                  

It will sell well enough that it will make a profit for Square. Which is what business is all about                                                                              

I figured I just like the color blue



Around the Network
samus aran rules on 22 November 2009
Xoj said:
this guy hates the PSP. for some reason since its now the top console in japan


Ever heard of DS? It´s this generation PS2 in Japan, no system comes close in either hardware or software sales. Not even Wii and PSP.



jneul on 22 November 2009
samus aran rules said:
jneul said:

hmm a thread abou tthe pspGo by a ninty fan(no offense intended), ok i seriousy doubt that this could not be more biased.
the pspGo was never meant to be a really huge sucess, but the psp is certainly picking up popularity in japan as it actually sells more over there than the ds, it's just the rest of the world prefers ds over psp, simple as that.


DS has sold over three million copies in Japan this year compared with the PSP´s 1,8 million so clearly DS is selling much more. It´s just the last three weeks that PSP has sold better and part of that is because Japan is waiting for the DSi LL which is launching now. Next week DS will be ahead in full swing yet again. DS is also almost selling as much software than PSP,WII,PS3,360 and PS2 put together in Japan. So yeah, no competiton there.

what another DS, how come every time psp starts to make a big comeback nintendo have to make another ds, the amounts of changes to both handhelds are unbelieable, what changes are they including for the new ds, just out of curiosity??

i never said the psp was huge competition and i did not mention the whole years sales, you clearly misunderstood what i was sayng, no doubt the next ds will sell loads, but we shall see.

anway psp cannot stand against worldwide sales of the ds, but at least it still sells well enough to keep on going, unlike any other handheld device has ever done, you have go to admit that is a big accomplishment.



it's the future of handheld

PS VITA = LIFE

The official Vita thread http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=130023&page=1

ChrisIsNotSexy on 22 November 2009
dsister44 said:
ChrisIsNotSexy said:
dsister44 said:
ChrisIsNotSexy said:

Wrong.

Developers made games for the PS2 because:

1.PS1 dominated it's generation.

2.PS2 dominated it's generation.

Why?Because of all those amazing franchises that Sony helped to be built in all these years.

Sony never payed to have an exclusive title on their console.

Their console was just so succeful the developers choosed it.

More like MS paying off Square Enix to have FF XIII on 360.

More like MS paying off Activision to have timed exclusive DLC.

Any proof of this? I would like a link supporting it                                                                                                                                                

Again, give me a link 

 

Links!!!  

Im talking about this generation on the first.

The other 2 are simply for no-brainers.

Why would Activision give MS timed exclusive DLC without any profit?

FF XIII wont sell too much on the 360,if it would,they would also bring FFXIV, and FF XIII Versus to it.

They payed for the exclusive Batman DLC                                                                                                                                                                  

It will sell well enough that it will make a profit for Square. Which is what business is all about                                                                              

I figured I just like the color blue

Im not really sure they payed for that Batman DLC,more like Square Enix adding it because the game sold better on the PS3.

Really?Well why dont they also release FF XIII Versus,and XIV for 360?That would sure make a profit for Square,like you said,but they wont,because in the eyes of MS,XIII is the most important title.

 



dsister44 on 22 November 2009
ChrisIsNotSexy said:
dsister44 said:
ChrisIsNotSexy said:

Im talking about this generation on the first.

The other 2 are simply for no-brainers.

Why would Activision give MS timed exclusive DLC without any profit?

FF XIII wont sell too much on the 360,if it would,they would also bring FFXIV, and FF XIII Versus to it.

They payed for the exclusive Batman DLC                                                                                                                                                                  

It will sell well enough that it will make a profit for Square. Which is what business is all about                                                                              

I figured I just like the color blue

Im not really sure they payed for that Batman DLC,more like Square Enix adding it because the game sold better on the PS3.

Really?Well why dont they also release FF XIII Versus,and XIV for 360?That would sure make a profit for Square,like you said,but they wont,because in the eyes of MS,XIII is the most important title.

 

Seeing as how I downloaded it the day of release I doubt that =P

About Final Fantasy XIV Microsoft are kinda of douche bags when it comes to XBL. http://www.vg247.com/2009/08/20/ffxiv-discussions-with-microsoft-holding-up-360-version/

And maybe Sony payed for exclusitivity of Versus



samus aran rules on 22 November 2009
jneul said:
samus aran rules said:
jneul said:

hmm a thread abou tthe pspGo by a ninty fan(no offense intended), ok i seriousy doubt that this could not be more biased.
the pspGo was never meant to be a really huge sucess, but the psp is certainly picking up popularity in japan as it actually sells more over there than the ds, it's just the rest of the world prefers ds over psp, simple as that.


DS has sold over three million copies in Japan this year compared with the PSP´s 1,8 million so clearly DS is selling much more. It´s just the last three weeks that PSP has sold better and part of that is because Japan is waiting for the DSi LL which is launching now. Next week DS will be ahead in full swing yet again. DS is also almost selling as much software than PSP,WII,PS3,360 and PS2 put together in Japan. So yeah, no competiton there.

what another DS, how come every time psp starts to make a big comeback nintendo have to make another ds, the amounts of changes to both handhelds are unbelieable, what changes are they including for the new ds, just out of curiosity??

i never said the psp was huge competition and i did not mention the whole years sales, you clearly misunderstood what i was sayng, no doubt the next ds will sell loads, but we shall see.

anway psp cannot stand against worldwide sales of the ds, but at least it still sells well enough to keep on going, unlike any other handheld device has ever done, you have go to admit that is a big accomplishment.

Yes I admit that PSP is quite an achievement from Sony on the portable market since Nintendo has had monopoly there for ages, however it still is Nintendos show since DS is their biggest seller ever among both portables and consoles. They accomplished this with harder competition than ever since many predicted PSP would be the new winner like the PS1 once were on consoles. That is also one hell of an accomplishment.

DSi LL is a new version of the DSi with much bigger screens that feels more like a portable you play at home like a console. It also has a longer batterylife than the original DSi. It seems to be doing rather good according to early reports. It will do very nice over the holidays anyway, no doubt about that.