By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - halo reach to have better graphics than uncharted 2 or killzone 2 confirmed

sabby_e17 on 21 November 2009

I doubt it. It will easily have a better art style than KZ2 (not U2), but graphicaly, I don't think so.

And this hasn't "confirmed" anything, hype is always bad.




Around the Network
Staude on 21 November 2009
Slimebeast said:

 

I called this.

Slimebeast said:
It's funny how bad people are at judging graphics quality. Only because the image quality is bad it hinders them from seeing how incredible these grafix are.

This I thought Halo on Xbox 3 would look like, not Halo in this gen already.

Better graphics than anything so far in this generation.

 

 

Slimebeast said:
Carl2291 said:
People are saying the graphics will destroy anything on PS3... And are the best this generation....

When the images are blurry and in (likely) in Alpha?

You are seriously comparing blurry alpha pics to Crysis... Killzone 2... Uncharted 2...?

It looks good, but not THAT good.

Destroy is too strong of a word. And no, visually GT5 is the best looking game in this gen from what we've seen so far. But anything else, yes, Halo Reach will look better.

I find it amusing that people are unable to see it (well, not u Carl). So I'm gonna make a prediciton so I can claim I called this later: 

Of all the games announced and released so far, Halo: Reach will be considered the best looking once we're seen proper gameplay footage 
(except for GT5, but then cos it's a racing game it kinda has an advantage).

Again, people take a look at this screen. It's all apparent on this screen that this game has a different level of graphics tech we've seen on X360 before:

 

I know it's blurry but if the models in the pic are anything to go by, the game's not really that advanced. You can see the verticles.



Check out my game about moles ^

ooozxooo on 21 November 2009

maybe in your dreams



Globox on 21 November 2009

some 10 yr old noob had "fake" interview with Greenberg.....sounds so retarded and fake. get a life.



<a href="http://profiles.us.playstation.com/playstation/psn/visit/profiles/Globox_82"><img src="http://fp.profiles.us.playstation.com/playstation/psn/pid/Globox_82.png" width="230" height="155" border="0" /></a><br/><a href="http://www.us.playstation.com/PSN/SignUp">Get your Portable ID!</a>

Taz! on 21 November 2009

Not happening, but no-one cares that its not happening



Around the Network
psrock on 21 November 2009

I am surprised he didn't compare it to games on his own console. that says a lot.



 Next Gen 

11/20/09 04:25 makingmusic476 Warning Other (Your avatar is borderline NSFW. Please keep it for as long as possible.)
DevDas on 21 November 2009

*Epic double handed facepalm*

that will be all gentle men



DevDas on 21 November 2009
Globox said:
some 10 yr old noob had "fake" interview with Greenberg.....sounds so retarded and fake. get a life.

exactly... dream on this gen!! ( yes iam slowly molding in to a fanboy)



Dgc1808 on 21 November 2009

I'll believe it when I see it.



4 ≈ One

BladeOfGod on 21 November 2009
Garnett said:

@Kowenicki

 

You know as i do, if MS was to tell us the Sky is purple, then we would B-E-L-I-E-V-E it, cus you know... They never lied to us before, i mean we only paid $600 for the "superior" system, and if we was to find out that the CPU and GPU were behind the half priced console, then i would feel ripped off.

 

We paid for the superior disk format, the actual gaming part of it is lacking behind the other HD console. I mean remember when our last gen system had Toy Story graphics? Yeah sure you do, cus they would never lie to us.

Troll some more