By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Slimebeast said:

 

I called this.

Slimebeast said:
It's funny how bad people are at judging graphics quality. Only because the image quality is bad it hinders them from seeing how incredible these grafix are.

This I thought Halo on Xbox 3 would look like, not Halo in this gen already.

Better graphics than anything so far in this generation.

 

 

Slimebeast said:
Carl2291 said:
People are saying the graphics will destroy anything on PS3... And are the best this generation....

When the images are blurry and in (likely) in Alpha?

You are seriously comparing blurry alpha pics to Crysis... Killzone 2... Uncharted 2...?

It looks good, but not THAT good.

Destroy is too strong of a word. And no, visually GT5 is the best looking game in this gen from what we've seen so far. But anything else, yes, Halo Reach will look better.

I find it amusing that people are unable to see it (well, not u Carl). So I'm gonna make a prediciton so I can claim I called this later: 

Of all the games announced and released so far, Halo: Reach will be considered the best looking once we're seen proper gameplay footage 
(except for GT5, but then cos it's a racing game it kinda has an advantage).

Again, people take a look at this screen. It's all apparent on this screen that this game has a different level of graphics tech we've seen on X360 before:





 

I know it's blurry but if the models in the pic are anything to go by, the game's not really that advanced. You can see the verticles.



Check out my game about moles ^