I don't believe that MW2 produce cost was 40-50m $. 40/50m $ for what ? They had an engine, experienced developer and the game isn't that different from MW. Now we know why they want games to be more expensive, because they're unable to spend money properly. Gears of War 2 cost was 12m $ for gods sake !
| donsterydo2 said: I don't believe that MW2 produce cost was 40-50m $. 40/50m $ for what ? They had an engine, experienced developer and the game isn't that different from MW. Now we know why they want games to be more expensive, because they're unable to spend money properly. Gears of War 2 cost was 12m $ for gods sake ! |
that's only the money Epic spend on this game, but not the game development budget. plus there was quite a lot of stars doing voice acting for MW2. not to mention the fact that since sony make other publishers hold servers for their games cost of holding MW2 servers for ps3 gamers is quite high.
WOW thats how much titanic cost!
Insane...
Uncharted 2 was 25 million $....
Who said PS3 games are expensive to develop...
@sweep
ROFL ROFL ROFL!
true
but GT5 is 60 million!
10 million discs is an awful lot to print and ship. Probably cost at least $50 million right there.
"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.
| waron said: no wonder Activision bumped up the price of MW2. Halo 3 had 300mln ad campaign so 150mln is possible. makes me wonder how much did KZ2 cost - afterall it's the most expensive game that had the most expensive campaign out of all Sonys games. i though it was about 65-70mln budget for the whole game development and about 30-35mln campaign, but now i wouldn't be suprisd if it was 140-150mln project. heck, even Left 4 Dead 2 had like 35-50mln campaign(Valve alone spend more than 25mln on it and there's also MS money). we may have more flops on hd consoles than we previously thought. |
^thats scarey
...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...
PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk
really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...
$200 million sounds quite ridiculous. And the game cost $40 million to make??? For what? The game still looks like crap, it has the same engine, same multiplayer, short campaign and some maps. If thats true, they must be bad at managing money. I could actually see them spending $100 million on advertising and marketing but its mainly the actual game; I don't know how it cost $40 million.
nice =D lol i wish they gave me some of the money instead of a few ads on TV lol
| darthdevidem01 said: @sweep ROFL ROFL ROFL! true but GT5 is 60 million! |
GT5 is one of the games that has a huge ass budget even the dood at polyphony said and u know they r polyphony they do all top quality :D not like some games they make smthing shine and leave the rest out this crew polishes all :D
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
