By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - IGN AU gives AC 2 - 9.0 for 360, 8.8 for PS3 (360 = DEFINITIVE console ver)

XxXProphecyXxX said:
lol?? what are the reviewers suppose to say to ps3 owners only??? " Throw your ps3 out of the window AC2 on 360 looks slightly better ppl who bought a ps3 are dumb and missing out on a slightly better version of AC2"

 

Maybe they shouldn't be so explicit, althought... no... i mean... yeah... well... they shouldn't. Still, their job is to tell consumers there is a better version out there and specify it not only in the text (and even that many reviewers don't dare) but in the score also.

 

And they are scared. Remember when gametrailers was bashed by hordes of fanboys for having given a so-so grade on MGS4's story ? They were harrassed for weeks by hundreds of fanatics. PS3 fanboys even made sigs in masses to better bash gametrailers ! Who does that ?



God i hate fanboys, almost as much as they hate facts

 

“If you want to build a ship, don't drum up people together to collect wood and don't assign them tasks and work, but rather teach them to long for the endless immensity of the sea” Antoine de St-Exupery

  +2Q  -2N  (to be read in french)

Around the Network
DaGreatestHope said:
I got the game for PS3 and these problems are blown way out of porportion by a few handful of reviewers.

It has like 20 reviews or so and no one mentions this crap except IGN AU and Lens of Truth.

So far I have been playing for 6 hours. It is great fun and way better than the first.

The graphics look nice, Ezio moves smoothly from place to place, and nothing much to complain about.

Even Kotaku.com reviewed the PS3 version and they found nothing to moan about.

AC suffers from the same problems that many sandbox games have. It has screen tearing, pop ins, and minor frame rate problems. So did GTA 4 and InFamous. Did that stop them from being AAA quality games? Get over yourselves, PS3 version of AC is AAA.

 

See what I mean ? Two sites are doing their job and a PS3 fanboy instantly considers them below Kotaku.

 

For fergusons' sake dude ! Kotaku is a friggin' blog !



God i hate fanboys, almost as much as they hate facts

 

“If you want to build a ship, don't drum up people together to collect wood and don't assign them tasks and work, but rather teach them to long for the endless immensity of the sea” Antoine de St-Exupery

  +2Q  -2N  (to be read in french)

awww....they made sigs bashing Gametrailers? However will Gametrailers deal with that? Obviously all good PS3 reviews are really just a frightenned reviewer who doesn't want people being mean to him ; ;

If you write reviews people are going to disagree sometimes and sometimes they'll be pricks about it, if they really couldn't handle that they shouldn't be reviewers, but honestly I doubt it bothers them.



...

Aw, I wanted to see if I would get it for the PS3 this time around.



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
Gh0st4lifE said:
CommonMan said:
hsrob said:

2%, that's huge! I don't know how any self respecting PS3 fan could buy that version of the game now :P


No problem for me, I haven't respected myself in years.

 

 

ROFL !

lol

@psrock: great minds, i was just going to go there.

Look, it sounds like there are some minor advantages to the 360 build of the game but not enough to make a big difference.  If it were me and I had both systems I might still be swayed by which controller is better for the game rather than a miserable 2%. If you only have one system buy the version you can play and don't worry about the other guy.

I don't for a second believe that IGN or any other reviewer can objectively arrive at scores of 88% and 90%.  They took off a couple of percent because they felt like it, for the minor differences between in graphics, loading or whatever it was. Who's to say whether those differences are worth 2%, 5% or 0% in the scheme of what the game offers. 

I would love if there was a universal controller that allowed blind game reviews, it would put the amazing discriminative powers of game reviewers to the test.



Around the Network
Torillian said:
awww....they made sigs bashing Gametrailers? However will Gametrailers deal with that? Obviously all good PS3 reviews are really just a frightenned reviewer who doesn't want people being mean to him ; ;

If you write reviews people are going to disagree sometimes and sometimes they'll be pricks about it, if they really couldn't handle that they shouldn't be reviewers, but honestly I doubt it bothers them.

 

Yeah yeah we know the story. There are morrons in every group and you should never, ever, ever, EVER ! ... generalize.

 

If so tell me then why xbox fans do not act like angered sheep when Halo 3 gets a bad review ? And what about the wii ? huh ? It gets bashed so often its' not even funny anymore and you still don't see nintendo fans making weird sigs out of it.



God i hate fanboys, almost as much as they hate facts

 

“If you want to build a ship, don't drum up people together to collect wood and don't assign them tasks and work, but rather teach them to long for the endless immensity of the sea” Antoine de St-Exupery

  +2Q  -2N  (to be read in french)

Gh0st4lifE said:
DaGreatestHope said:
I got the game for PS3 and these problems are blown way out of porportion by a few handful of reviewers.

It has like 20 reviews or so and no one mentions this crap except IGN AU and Lens of Truth.

So far I have been playing for 6 hours. It is great fun and way better than the first.

The graphics look nice, Ezio moves smoothly from place to place, and nothing much to complain about.

Even Kotaku.com reviewed the PS3 version and they found nothing to moan about.

AC suffers from the same problems that many sandbox games have. It has screen tearing, pop ins, and minor frame rate problems. So did GTA 4 and InFamous. Did that stop them from being AAA quality games? Get over yourselves, PS3 version of AC is AAA.

 

See what I mean ? Two sites are doing their job and a PS3 fanboy instantly considers them below Kotaku.

 

For fergussons' sake dude ! Kotaku is a friggin' blog !

What about when Kotaku posts ludricious articles trying to downplay the PS3 or Sony? They would be more likely to say AC 2 is crap on PS3 but they didnt and greatly enjoyed it.

Second, I have the game and the problems brought up by IGN AU are not evident to what I am seeing right now. Lens of Truth comparison almost caused me not to buy it. I went in looking for GoW Collection and AC Bloodlines. They did not have the former, so what the hey I took the plunge and got AC 2.

I am almost angry at Lens of Truth for almost making me miss out on a great game. Yea the game has its problems but it is not like the PS3 versions runs at 5 FPS with blindingly horrible screen tearing that renders all characters in halfs? No sir that is not happening right now as I play it.

You calling me a fanboy shows how much gaming has become unpleasant due to the constant bashing and incessant name-calling. I enjoy gaming on the PS3.

Ok if you dont believe me, I have a game called Splinter Cell DA on the PS3 and I am truthfully gonna say it is crap. The framerate is horrible and the graphics stink. It is awful.

But I am not saying it for AC 2 because that is not what I am experiencing. It I was experiencing that, I would be ranting about it and would have sold the copy already.

If a multiplat needs all these microscopes and expensive tool sets to tell you a minimal difference you will probably not notice during gameplay, believe me it is not worth it.

 



Are you telling me that Wii fans don't get mad about reviews they disagree with or companies doing things they don't like? What a load, that happens right on this site or did you miss the "boycott ____" craze? And no Xbox fan was mad about bad Halo 3 reviews? Again a bunch of bull.

You see what you want to see, always been true. No group of fans is worse as a whole than any other. They all act like idiots from time to time, stop thinking you're better just because you prefer one piece of plastic over another.



...

Just another demonstration of the shortcomings of review scoring systems like this. Either the differences are significant enough to make the PS3 version absolutely inferior, in which case it should be a 8.0 or 8.5 game vs the 360's 9.0, or the differences are insignificant and the review scores should be the same. Having 0.1 margins in game reviews only serves to fuel the fires of the fanatical by giving people miniscule differences to blow into gargantuan proportions.

And Metacritic is even worse. Since people mentioned Dragon Age Origins I think it's ridiculous that PS3 has 89% on Meta and 360 has 87%, and PC version has 91%. Basically PC version deserves a 9 score, just, so should be 9.0. PS3 and 360 versions don't appear to deserve 9s so should both get 8.5s.

At the end of the day the quality differences only have relevance for the person who owns both consoles. If you only have a PS3 you're not going to be put off the game by this review. If you only have a 360 you're not going to be convinced it is a must have game by this review.

It's in the write up of a review that the technical edge should be mentioned to give the multiconsole owner a steer regarding which version to buy. For everyone else we just need to know whether a game sits in the C, B, A, or A+ category.



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

Torillian said:
Are you telling me that Wii fans don't get mad about reviews they disagree with? What a load, that happens right on this site or did you miss the "boycott ____" craze? And no Xbox fan was mad about bad Halo 3 reviews? Again a bunch of bull.

You see what you want to see, always been true. No group of fans is worse as a whole than any other. They all act like idiots from time to time, stop thinking you're better just because you prefer one piece of plastic over another.

 

They don't get pissed on an industrialized scale now do they ?!? They rant, spit, throw a fist or two, leave, come back and calm the fuck down the way in-di-vi-du-als should.

 

"No group of fans is worse as a whole than any other."

 

Yeah right. You can even sense differences from one website to the other, even more from one country to the other (an Xbox fan in France gets twice the heat than in the US, believe me). Its' just so "cliché" to just level it all out it's already wearing me out



God i hate fanboys, almost as much as they hate facts

 

“If you want to build a ship, don't drum up people together to collect wood and don't assign them tasks and work, but rather teach them to long for the endless immensity of the sea” Antoine de St-Exupery

  +2Q  -2N  (to be read in french)