By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Infinity Ward describes relationship with Treyarch

and we see a IW bot defending himself here......



 

   
Around the Network

Say whatever you want, but do it with reason, COD WaW doesn´t has mood as IW has.. and compare the financial status of each and foundation date of each...

So.. who is a bot? PERIOD.



PSN: franco-br
MGS4, GH, MW2, GT5p, WipeoutHD, etc..etc..

kibebr said:
famousringo said:
So far nobody has mentioned that Activision gave Treyarch a mere 8 months to make Call of Duty 3. Just 8 months, and they deliver a decent game to multiple platforms. I don't expect a better result from any other developer operating under such severe constraints.

Inifinity Ward has never had less than two years to finish one of their Call of Duty games.

So TreyArch needs a new board, because theyr games aren´t AAA+ or A, just B or C+... so, when a company has 2 years to do a game and RULEZ out, it´s incredible, a lot more profit comming in...

About being open mind, you must love then because they propose to do art and not comercial games... it´s smells not so good... they need to focus, be a man and do an A+ game...

So , if the problem is time do develop, change the president and board do TreyArch to have more time and be respected...

I see just Treyarch BOTs defending themselves...HERE.

You don't really understand the relationship between a developer and its publisher, do you? Activision tells Infinity Ward to make them a new Call of Duty every two years. Activision tells Treyarch to do everything else. Activision sets the project, the funding levels and the release date, and all Treyarch can do is deliver it the best they can with the constraints given to them.

Not sure why I'm arguing with you when all you do is hurl baseless ad-hominems in horrible English. You'd think that if I were an android built by Treyarch that I would have at least one game made by them in my collection...



"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event."  — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.

Since the general public doesn't see Treyarch/ Infinity Ward and only recognises Call of Duty/ Call of Duty, the two companies should communicate a little for the sake of the customer.



i like treyarch games alot, i prefer their call of duty games to infinity wards versions.



GAMERTAG IS ANIMEHEAVEN X23

PSN ID IS : ANIMEREALM 

PROUD MEMBER OF THE RPG FAN CLUB THREAD

ALL-TIME FAVORITE JRPG IS : LOST ODYSSEY

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=52882&page=1

Around the Network
disolitude said:
Chairman-Mao said:
Treyarch fucking sucks and copies every idea IW has. I bet Call of Duty 7 goes back to WWII courtesy of Treyarch.

You don't know what you are talking about and are a walking example of an ignorant gamer.

Games done by Treyarch

Die by the Sword (1998)
Die by the Sword: Limb from Limb (1998) (Expansion Pack)
Triple Play 2000 (1999)
Draconus: Cult of the Wyrm (2000)
Max Steel: Covert Missions (2000)
Triple Play 2001 (2000)
NHL 2K2 (2001)
Triple Play Baseball (2001)
Kelly Slater's Pro Surfer (2002)
Minority Report: Everybody Runs (2002)
Spider-Man (2002)
NHL 2K3 (2002)
Spider-Man 2 (2004)
Call of Duty 2: Big Red One (2005)
Ultimate Spider-Man (2005)
Call of Duty 3 (2006)
Spider-Man 3 (2007) (Only developed the Xbox 360, PC & PS3 version of the game)
Spider-Man: Web of Shadows (2008) Wii, PS3, PS2, Xbox 360, Nintendo DS, PC
Quantum of Solace (2008) PS3, Xbox 360, Wii, Nintendo DS, PC
Call of Duty: World at War (2008) PS3, Xbox 360, Wii, PC , Nintendo DS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare: Reflex (2009) Wii

Games done by Infinity Ward

Call of Duty 
Call of Duty 2
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2

I'd say one is a little bit more multi talented than the other.

Treyarch has really improved as a shooter developer over the past few years and they certainly have a more robust catalog than IW.

On the other hand, shouldn't we be giving IW some credit for MoH: Allied Assault? When it comes to pure shooters, I think IW is a superior developer. It's not as lopsided as it once was but they still set the gold standard for crafting war shooters.




Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/

famousringo said:

 

You don't really understand the relationship between a developer and its publisher, do you? Activision tells Infinity Ward to make them a new Call of Duty every two years. Activision tells Treyarch to do everything else. Activision sets the project, the funding levels and the release date, and all Treyarch can do is deliver it the best they can with the constraints given to them.

Not sure why I'm arguing with you when all you do is hurl baseless ad-hominems in horrible English. You'd think that if I were an android built by Treyarch that I would have at least one game made by them in my collection...


OK, sorry about my really bad english... but I am pointing that if TreyArch "does everything else" as the Publisher asks.. it´s wrong, they need better timming to deliver a+ games, this is what I am trying to say..



PSN: franco-br
MGS4, GH, MW2, GT5p, WipeoutHD, etc..etc..