I don't see no HUGE difference between the two. What I see is each game renders different environments, and are tailored for different environments. MW2 also runs at 60 FPS and has split screen. KZ2 doesn't, but has bots and supports more online.

I think Killzone 2 looks really bad, most of the time. Techniqally impressive, but artistically lacking. It's also rather stiff and boring.

Modern Warfare 2 is not the prettiest game either, but it is alive and kicking. It also had the advantage of change. No two enviroments look the same. Snowstorm, desert, slum, suburbs, oil-rig... they all look vastly different from each other.

oh yh MW2 looks photorealistic because it has the coulor green but KZ does not because the game is dark.

Ok i guess not time doesnt exist in your world. Oh i guess the star wars films aint photo realistic most of them time.

Please just get out my thread with your drivvle. When most people think a game look sbetter then another then you just have to accept that your opinion is in th eminority and move on. Not call evryone who doesnt agree with you wrong. After all it is an opinion. I mean some people say Mario galexy is the best looking game.

I disagree but i wont call them liars and stupid. Its what they like at the end of the day so if you like COD MW2. then good for you but if most people are telling you a certain ames looks better then just give up and move on.

And since when did i get the worse MW2 pics? I picked those pics from a site that was comparing the PS3 and the 360 version so i could make sure the PC version couldnt sneak its way onto my thread. And you will probably say but but the game pic has the x-box A button. Well yes it will if you connect a 360 controller to the PC.

are you playing the 360 version of MW2 or PS3 version? hate to break it to you but...

the MW2 360 version only is better than KZ2...KZ2 still reigns supreme over MW2(PS3)

Is that your opinion or certain fanboys opinion?

its me trying to comprehend what the OP is saying

imo

KZ2 >>>MW2 graphically 

MW2>KZ2  gameplay

I created this thread lol

And i am saying KZ2>>>>>>>>>PS360 MW2

the ps3 and 360 version look more or less the same to me. I would give the nod to the PS3 version though because 9/10 bloom effects just look like the contrast is set to full so. Even though i know the 360 version is tech superior. the ps3 version looks more appealing to me because the way the bloom was used.

But this thread is about KZ2 still being the best looking FPS on consoles. Certain 360 owners were saying look a multiplat games looks better then KZ2. 360 capable of better graphics then PS3 confirmed.

I dont mind a multiplat games looking better. But when the game in my opinion isnt a thread must be made and a graphics King can not be crowned untill it wins the graphics king thread.

MW2 like i thought it would


YOU DONT HAVE TO READ THAT WALL OF TEXT. i know i probably wouldnt lol

Lol, as if Kresh is still trying... keep digging that hole.

MW2 has better gameplay than Killzone 2. But Killzone 2 graphics is very, very better than MW2.

Anyway... MW2 is not the best multiplataform graphics of this gen... and Gears 2 is better in graphics on 360.

MW2 is the best FPS as a whole, but not graphically.

/thread end

ok im here to end this disagreement. Killzone 2 looks technically better as in better explosions, particle effects, textures and lighting.MW2 has WAY more enviorments such as desserts, snow, slums, suberbs, and washington d.c. also mw2 has alot more WOW moments such as builings falling, citys burning, and the EMP part. the only WOW moment i had i n Killzone 2 was the first scene of storming the beach. So when it comes to reviews MW2 deserves a higher score.