Kresh3 said:
now 1 question, do you really think its graphically superior just because everything blurrs cracy when you move your analog-stick (which makes it gay too play btw)? on a technical basis MW2 >> KZ2. but if you prefer your futuristic non-sense grayish blurrish while moving graphics better, okey. i like photorealistic graphics more. |
oh yh MW2 looks photorealistic because it has the coulor green but KZ does not because the game is dark.
Ok i guess not time doesnt exist in your world. Oh i guess the star wars films aint photo realistic most of them time.
Please just get out my thread with your drivvle. When most people think a game look sbetter then another then you just have to accept that your opinion is in th eminority and move on. Not call evryone who doesnt agree with you wrong. After all it is an opinion. I mean some people say Mario galexy is the best looking game.
I disagree but i wont call them liars and stupid. Its what they like at the end of the day so if you like COD MW2. then good for you but if most people are telling you a certain ames looks better then just give up and move on.
And since when did i get the worse MW2 pics? I picked those pics from a site that was comparing the PS3 and the 360 version so i could make sure the PC version couldnt sneak its way onto my thread. And you will probably say but but the game pic has the x-box A button. Well yes it will if you connect a 360 controller to the PC.
Nobody's perfect. I aint nobody!!!
Killzone 2. its not a fps. it a FIRST PERSON WAR SIMULATOR!!!! ..The true PLAYSTATION 3 launch date and market dominations is SEP 1st ![]()









