What message do you send anyone if you rate MW2 worse than Big Rigs?  Only message I see here is that you are a poor judge of quality.  You send messages by not buying, and then writing the creators/publishers of the game telling them why.  You are also up for organizing a boycott if you like.  But showing that you don't have a clue as to how to rate a game, only sends a message that you are a poor evaluator of quality.

As someone who is admirers how Big Rigs failed so miserably, I am offended you drag MW2 down to its level.

Where did I defend the game industry?

Some of you need to calm down. Say you don't like the game, say it's not good. That's one thing. But making such ridiculous exaggerations and acting like Big Rigs is more redeeming in any way is just idiotic.

You have to understand this is a protest at IW not releasing a PC version of MW2 but a port of the console version.  Unlike every other PC version of a CoD title (since before there were console versions) this time around they have simply not produced a PC level product.  Absolutely standard features of a PC product have been removed, and they are essentially offering the console version with K&M support, which is not going to go down well with PC gamers - as you can see.

I was planning on getting MW2 on PC, cancelled this when I reviewed the features of the solution.  Decided that it was clearly an excellent console game and bought it on PS3.  Had I bought it on PC I would have recognized the strenghs of the game, but would have judged it far harsher for what it is missing to represent a proper PC version of this title.

The message is not that "this game worths 7.5". 

The message is: "Fuck you, Activision, and we hope that all the African animals will rape your decision makers in the ass, one by one, until you beg for a mercy death."

Alby_da_Wolf said: When a game deserves a bashing, reviewers must not be shy. I miss the old ugly blue pants of PC Zone Pants award: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PC_Zone#Review_system Suggesting to boil bad developers alive like lobsters, well, PC Zone in its most glorious days was pure genius!

Ahh, the Charlie Brooker era. I remember one game being described as 'less interesting than watching a horse piss into a bucket'. PCZ is a bit shit these days, though (Martin Korda is particularly shit); PC Gamer's a far better read.

LOL. And besides being amusing, it was also a lot more useful, for the purpose of choosing good games, than lax magazines giving high scores to every game.