By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Tons of features or simple game?

The title introduces the thread.

 

Do a game needs online, level creators or other features to satisfy you?

 

Do you think that when you passed a game, you passed it or you must have online and tons of features to make the game longer? 

 

Personnaly, I think that when a game is completed, neither you restart it, nor you go on another game.



Around the Network
guiduc said:

The title introduces the thread.

 

Do a game needs online, level creators or other features to satisfy you?

Absolutely not.

Do you think that when you passed a game, you passed it or you must have online and tons of features to make the game longer? 

If by this you mean beat then, no.  I often beat a game once and won't play it again for months, if not years.  In other cases, if the gameplay is varied or polished enough to keep my interest, I'll be playing it for dozens of hours.  You don't need online or level creators for that in my opinion.

Personnaly, I think that when a game is completed, neither you restart it, nor you go on another game.

 



Pixel Art can be fun.

I think it depends on the game.



online means very little to me. multiplayer though means a lot. a game doesnt have to have a bunch of features in it as long as its fun. i will generally play single player games until i beat or complete them, i play multiplayer games until people stop playing them with me.



Well it needs to be either a long game like an RPG/Sports game that will last a long time, or if its a shooter then it has to have online.

I think online play is pretty standard these days for shooters. Without it they aren't really worth the purchase with the exception of certain really good ones like Drake's Fortune.