| Erik Aston said: I addressed reviews. It was reviewed on traditional standards for what makes a "good game." The game itself was meant to render those standards irrelevant. It is succeeding. Given that, I find it kind of hard to criticize it receiving an award for innovation. Edit: and btw, your reference to review scores and comparisons with other games in your first post were, at best, erm, "vague." P.P.S. Trench warfare? The game just won six awards, and you're arguing it is "bad" based on critical reaction. Sounds more like you're surrendering Paris to me. |
That's clever.
Like I said, I have a personal vendetta against the game. If you take awards from Bafta over major game sites and reviews, then that's fine. But as this thread has shown, one's opinion flows with their fanboyism. I don't like Wii Sports, and many professional reviewers have given it average scores.
Wii Sports is a great game, but games should win awards based on their deepness and structure. Perhaps I should have been more specific. If I had known the thread would be filled with so many sensitive people, I would've been. Yeesh.
