By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Dad shoot son over video game!

Killergran on 26 October 2009
Gnizmo said:

Because crazy drunken sociopaths would never use a different weapon, and totally would follow gun control laws. Cause they are such moral and upstanding citizens.

When I want to kill someone, I want it to be easy and quick. I also don't want to stand close enough to get blood all over my clothing. And I damned well don't want to have to run while drunk just to catch him. Guns are the way to go. Noone should need to get out of breath just because of a little killing.



This is invisible text!

Around the Network
Gnizmo on 26 October 2009
Killergran said:

When I want to kill someone, I want it to be easy and quick. I also don't want to stand close enough to get blood all over my clothing. And I damned well don't want to have to run while drunk just to catch him. Guns are the way to go. Noone should need to get out of breath just because of a little killing.

Bows, cars, rocks, and a number of other devices will serve you well.



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

PullusPardus on 26 October 2009

why blame games?
why blame guns?

he was drunk and 80% of accidents are caused from drinking.
they should ban alcohol!
or just ban having sex if you are an asshole!



MetalGearSolid_4ever on 26 October 2009
Gnizmo said:
Killergran said:

When I want to kill someone, I want it to be easy and quick. I also don't want to stand close enough to get blood all over my clothing. And I damned well don't want to have to run while drunk just to catch him. Guns are the way to go. Noone should need to get out of breath just because of a little killing.

Bows, cars, rocks, and a number of other devices will serve you well.

Flamethrowers, Poisoning food, booby traps, vapourizing using alien technology ? Please.

 



Gnizmo on 26 October 2009
PullusPardus said:
why blame games?
why blame guns?

he was drunk and 80% of accidents are caused from drinking.
they should ban alcohol!
or just ban having sex if you are an asshole!

Tried that. Turns out people will all get drunk secretly, get really pissed off, and start Beer Riots. It would be a good idea in theory though.



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

Around the Network
johnsobas on 26 October 2009
PullusPardus said:
why blame games?
why blame guns?

he was drunk and 80% of accidents are caused from drinking.
they should ban alcohol!
or just ban having sex if you are an asshole!

so according to the people in this thread you ban guns and they will kill the kid anyway or get a gun illegally.  If that's the case I don't see why the dad wouldn't either get alcohol illegally or get high in another way. 



currently playing: Skyward Sword, Mario Sunshine, Xenoblade Chronicles X

Gnizmo on 26 October 2009
MetalGearSolid_4ever said:

Flamethrowers, Poisoning food, booby traps, vapourizing using alien technology ? Please.

 

Please what? I am doing my best to try and engage the other side of this argument. Give me a realistic explanation why the gun should be the focus of this tragedy. I have explained very well how a number of other devices could easily be used to achieve similar results.



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

scruffybunny on 26 October 2009

Well the kid would still be alive if pops didn't have a gun, sure he would belt him maybe, but that is unlikely to kill.




MetalGearSolid_4ever on 26 October 2009
Gnizmo said:
MetalGearSolid_4ever said:

Flamethrowers, Poisoning food, booby traps, vapourizing using alien technology ? Please.

 

Please what? I am doing my best to try and engage the other side of this argument. Give me a realistic explanation why the gun should be the focus of this tragedy. I have explained very well how a number of other devices could easily be used to achieve similar results.

Virginity rocks.



Gnizmo on 26 October 2009
scruffybunny said:
Well the kid would still be alive if pops didn't have a gun, sure he would belt him maybe, but that is unlikely to kill.

Because no other weapon would have been available to him? He couldn't have had a knife, pipe, rock, fist, car, or anything else and just gone nuts? Killing one person is not terribly difficult I am afraid. If he would reach for a gun something tells me the next logical choice in his mind would not be "non-lethal force."



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229