By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Malstrom: "digital distribution (only, not as an alternative) will..

...destroy game companies".

His newest article, found here: http://seanmalstrom.wordpress.com/

“What’s in it for me?” That is a very slick way of defining the PSP Go as it was made for Sony’s interest and not the consumers’ interest.

When PSP Go is sent to die, which it will die, people are going to be crying and saying, “But… but… this is going to delay digital distribution! If Sony only didn’t have such a high price…”

Ahh, but digital distribution and higher prices are one of the same. They cannot be separated. The entire movement behind digital distribution is being animated by game companies who are trying to create more revenue.

In a way, I hope these game companies do go digital distribution. It will destroy them. They need the used games market. They need physical games because you can’t exactly wrap a digital copy under the Christmas tree (which is why most games are bought around Christmas). With digital distribution, the “Game Industry” can kiss the children’s market good-bye forever. Children do not run around with credit cards.

If digital distribution took hold, they would not stop there. Then, you would be charged per time or number of times you play the game. You there, in the back, don’t laugh. They see the gravy train of the MMORPG and wish to replicate it for themselves. Now, the MMORPG such as WoW was due to tons of content, but game companies aren’t even interested in that.

If the “Game Industry” was healthy, then why is there so much need to increase revenue from individual games? A healthy industry should have revenue raining from above.

The “Game Industry” is in a conservation mode with trying to carve out more revenue from their existing and shrinking sales. It is like a someone trying to ration out their food instead of working to make more food.

The “Game Industry” must seek to expand and make new customers. If not, it will surely die.



Around the Network

No matter how good and fast my internet connection is in the future, I hope DD is there only as an alternative option.



Well MP3s, H264/Xvid and eReaders have yet to destroy CDs, DVDs/Blu-Rays and books. I think physical forms will always exist even if its with diminished sales.



thats right



Why do people keep quoting the fool every week.
If you like Maelstrom that much just post on his site...



PS3-Xbox360 gap : 1.5 millions and going up in PS3 favor !

PS3-Wii gap : 20 millions and going down !

Around the Network
Scoobes said:
Well MP3s, H264/Xvid and eReaders have yet to destroy CDs, DVDs/Blu-Rays and books. I think physical forms will always exist even if its with diminished sales.

He says "only" meaning if DVDs, CDs and books went away to give hold to only DD those industries would be destroyed also.



Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.



All industries always look to increase profits, no matter how healthy they are.



Well then I hope they do it soon so that the market will be more open for standards based platforms instead of this ridiculous incompatible mess of proprietary APIs and formats we have now. You shouldn't have repurchase the same games just to play them on different devices.

That's partly why ROMs and emulators will always be around. I want to play Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles III on my DS dammut!



Correction his Maelstroms blogs are not his articles. His blogs are opinion his articles are interpretations. His blogs are often prone to his biased opinions where as his articles are based on someone else's work, but still have his perspective application.

Yes i'm aware of the site saying Maelstrom Article News, but as I said his personal comments are just as prone to fanboy bias(PC orientated). Though I do enjoy his reads I find some of them are already mistaken before he posts. Much like his User Generated Content opinions.

He has some valid points though

"If the “Game Industry” was healthy, then why is there so much need to increase revenue from individual games? A healthy industry should have revenue raining from above.

The “Game Industry” is in a conservation mode with trying to carve out more revenue from their existing and shrinking sales. It is like a someone trying to ration out their food instead of working to make more food.

The “Game Industry” must seek to expand and make new customers. If not, it will surely die.
"

Also he made a point in one of his actual articles. "Retail is still King". Until an online computer is the equivalent penetration of the personal phone(home or cell only bachelors) the DD model will never make it as the sole model. The reason the iPhone works is because there is no and never was a cell phone software retail market.

The DSi is making some success with DSi ware, because the DSL managed to some serious penetration that it was only a next step. The PSP while a nice device didn't make the same penetrion, but Sony only hoped to it would work.

Finally DD is working PC because PC is now essentially an internet gateway. If you have a PC it could be almost guaranteed that you are now connected to the internet. Still many PC users will prefer to buy stuff from stores.



Squilliam: On Vgcharts its a commonly accepted practice to twist the bounds of plausibility in order to support your argument or agenda so I think its pretty cool that this gives me the precedent to say whatever I damn well please.

Ail said:
Why do people keep quoting the fool every week.
If you like Maelstrom that much just post on his site...

I know what you mean.  I find myself doing the same sort of thing.



the2bears - the indie shmup blog