| lestatdark said: @atma998 Yes because I wanted to use SML since it was the first SMB game to be released on a portable console, but i couldn't find the data. My point was to compare a first generation portable nintendo handheld to the first generation portable sony handheld, so even though I couldn't find, I used a second generation, which is stlll giving the upper hand to nintendo. I couldn't give a damn about the sales of both games, to me, Mario and GT are of equal quality in their own genres, but the comparisons you are offering are simply ridiculous. You're only using the best selling nintendo consoles, what about the n64, what about the gamecube, you're forgetting those? Nintendo is the dominant manufacturer this generation, whether it's handheld or home console, and will be till the end of this generation, but it wasn't like this in the past two gens, and Sony did what no other manufacturer has ever done on the handheld terrain, to actually give a proper competition to nintendo. |
Yeah but my point is that you took a 20 years old port as an example while GT:PSP is a complete new game and thus cannot be taken seriously for your analysis.
But I completely agree with your last statement about giving Nintendo his first real competitor in the handheld market.







