Just as with many Wii titles, a review based against common game scoring templates is going to be kind of meaningless for this title.

I'm not saying it's great, but it's simply not your typical game, and as such reviews will tend to be lower and less cohesive in their view of the title.

I think like, say Flower, this is a title you're going to have to make your own mind up on.

I think this game is more meant for people who just want to chill out and take pictures of animals they otherwise would never be able to.

Isn't this a Nat Geo game somewhere? That's basically the targeted audience (Nat Geo readers).

Its an exclusive so its automatically better than anything else!

OT- I think this could be a very fun game, not ever game has to be shooting terrorist,nazi or aliens. 

Weren't this supposed to kill Endless Ocean?

Yeah. Funny thing is, they aren't too different. Does brand power matter? Yup!*

*not saying Afrika is a good game. Snap wasn't.

well, maybe someone should have reviewed it that actually is a bit interested in photography

this review reminds me of IGN US' Singstar ABBA review (which was written by Greg Miller aswell) - he only knew 2 songs and didn't care about the other ones (although nearly all of them are fantastic and very well known), so he rated it down, lol

There's no room for trying to be creatively different. Has to shoot something or gets no good review lol

I'll give £10 to every player who, after an hour of playing, doesn't wish they could have a gun.

All his reasonings sound good, the graphics are stiff, and out dated, the presentation has no style, is clunky, and saving takes... 1 Minute & 20 Seconds....seriously?

i was looking to picking this up, if it gets to a less idiotic/"ionlyplaypopulargames" reviewer (Greg miller) and get reviewed badly, guess i'll save up my money for something else

i miss these types of games though.