gamelover2000 said:
|
deal! ^__^
gamelover2000 said:
|
deal! ^__^
gamelover2000 said:
|
only if i can eightduple (?)this.....:D

"They will know heghan belongs to the helghast"
"England expects that everyman will do his duty"
"we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender"

I think its funny that people who make uninformed opinions about blu ray on the internet in a forum, make you sick.
Who cares? As long as there are good games on both platforms does it really make any difference?
So if you don't mind me asking, why is the OP here ripped a new one for saying he thinks its important for the 360 to maintain its lead over the PS3, when in a thread above, the OP thinks its important for the PS3 to overtake the 360 and he's met with "you know, that makes a lot of sense!"
Granted the Blu-Ray argument was sort of retarded, but then again so is charging 600 dollars for a system.
Its in the best interest of the industry for all three hardware giants to do well. Ultimately, it would make me none the happier if at the end of the day, everyone sold 99.99 million hardware units and we were all unbiased members of the gaming community.
However, that isn't the case. It's my opinion that Sony tried to be fashionably late to this generation and is just now playing catchup. They played the arrogance card a little too well. I personally hope Sony falls a little short of Microsoft, only because I agree more with MS's marketing, game library, controller, live service, and effort put into this generation more than their opponents.
If Sony outright won, it would justfiy all of their retarded decisions they've made over the last several years. I want them to be constantly feeling the heat of being third; I think it drastically speeds up the improvement of their product. It's my opinion and you can disagree with it, but saying this does not make me a MS fanboy. I grew up with the first Playstation. I graduated high school in 02 while beating FF10 repeatedly (neerrrrrrd).
But there's a competitive edge that the PS3 lacks, and it trickles down from the software end to the way they handle their exclusive titles. If anything this forum has taught me, its that the only reason why the company is even afloat to start with is its incredibly loyal and passionate fanbase. My hats off to all of you. But I just can't dedicate my money to the product unless I am happy with what said product would give me. And right now, I'm not sure I would be satisfied with it.
it is not important at all, because M$ is doing so much to stay ahead!!!! ha-ha syke
How important is it that more Honda Civics are sold then Mercedes Benz?
I can tell you the Mercedes benz guys don't really care and are busy enjoying their cars.
original account - http://www.vgchartz.com/profiles/profile.php?tab=forum&id=31441
Lmao he's back trolling the ps3
<embed src="http://card.mygamercard.net/gears2goty/omar7700.swf" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="198" height="135">
</embed>
Hey, there are people that care legitimaly that the PS3 beats 360, one of those is me, and why is that legitimate? because i have money on it.
(I really care about the games, but hey, winning more than double my 20 bucks bet is also really important XD XD XD )
sony always had a better format (except for umd).
though i hope ps3 wins since imo it's a better machine.