ssj12 said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
ssj12 said:
That not true, I just bought a puzzle game on Steam for $9 that makes most puzzle games on consoles and handhelds look like crap. (I'll review it eventually for the site)
The reason why PC gaming is so "expensive" is because you need to upgrade every few years, but this really isn't a massive flaw because with new hardware comes more useability for everything. With consoles you can upgrade every few years and get an virtually unchanging environment which can cost as much as a simple upgrade for a PC that will make it last another few years.
Plus console games are freaking expensive with no real ability to expand the playtime without having to pay out an arm or leg for additional content..
|
Not if you rent them.
|
but we aren't talking rentals, we are talking owning and buying new games since you can't exactly trade in a rented game to gamestop (you could but have fun with paying whatever company you rented their game frim for the game)
|
Why aren't we talking about all the flaws of DD? The rental market is important to a lot of people. Gamefly is huge, and when you can't rent a game, but you have to download it, for a high price, then it's a major issue.
You seem to think that the "excuse" of B&M stores driving up game prices, changes the facts.
That's something I've seen for a long time.
An end result screws gamers, like the PS3's old price, or the lack of rentals and used games on the PSP, or the high prices on PSN.
And instead of saying, "Yeah, that's a flaw, but there are things that are also positives about the console," people say, "Oh well, it's because of something else, blame them, and just accept the flaw, because it's not Sony's fault."
Who cares whose fault it is?
Who cares what reasonings these companies have behind their screwings?
Isn't the end result the issue here, and not our presumed reasonings?
Should I say, "OH, it's not Sony's fault, so I'll pay more for less, because it isn' the MONEY that matters, it's the idea of getting screwed that prevents me from buying this."
Why should I care about that? Who really cares about that? Proponents of DD and the PSP Go do, certainly, because it's the only way to justify their argument. The "why" of a screwjob doesn't change the end result.
Should I buy corn at 200 dollars an ear, because there was a droubt?
Maybe I should just stick to beans.
I think that you might be attempting to compare the PC DD system to the consoles and it just doesn't translate.
DD will never, and has never been as good as owning a physical copy. Sure, it has certain advantages(available over the interenet, don't have to care for a disc), but the reality is the DD system was invented to prevent the distribution of games freely. It starts on PC, because PC is a free system, and needed control, to prevent piracy, and installs between computers with easy CD hacks. The PSP and the DS are the next DD targets, because they have terrible piratism.
DD isn't better, and it never will be. On PC, on Playstation, anywhere. It's worse. It's less free. It limits the market to the sellers choice, not the buyers.
Eventually, it might not be "worse" but I don't see how that will ever happen, with all the political and individual ownership issues inherant to digital copies of games.
You can never sell the item you bought, after you've finished with it, and until you can do that, we've got a problem. Especially if you're charging a premium, and I don't care how bad the droubt was.