| nordlead said:
EDIT: thats what happens when you decide to actually follow the link. You don't get done reading in time for your original post to be pointing at the right person |
So THAT'S what the quote button is for!
| nordlead said:
EDIT: thats what happens when you decide to actually follow the link. You don't get done reading in time for your original post to be pointing at the right person |
So THAT'S what the quote button is for!
Lol this seems like Batman : AA all over again.
Really hope the game is good.
Owner of : PS1/PSOne , PS2 phat/slim , PS3 phat/slim , PS Eye+Move and PSP phat/slim/brite/go (Sony)
The Official PS Vita Thread! Get all your latest PS Vita news here! Come join us!
Torillian said:
naughty Dog just decided to send games out early and not have an embargo. Halo ODST was done months ago and they could've done the exact same thing, they just decided not to. |
Well if thats the case I guarantee you there are stipulations...otherwise IGN would be doing the review this week. They must get to choose which reviews go out early or something.
fadetoone said:
So THAT'S what the quote button is for! |
lol, I know what the quote is for, was trying to be lazy and respond real quick then changed my mind. Anyways, since you pointed out that I didn't do it right, I'll let you know your sig is too big before I have to send you a warning 
(example post - http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/post.php?id=2592629 )





disolitude said:
Well if thats the case I guarantee you there are stipulations...otherwise IGN would be doing the review this week. They must get to choose which reviews go out early or something.
|
I have never seen a review copy with any kind of stipulations. I've had Demon's Souls for almost a month and even though I could've reviewed it before I was thinking of putting up the review a week before release when the game will most be on people's minds. Could be the exact same situation here.
...
| disolitude said: Games not out for a month. how do sony games get these early reviews? Killzone 2 had reviews a month in advance. Halo ODST is out in 5 ays and we are still waiting for a review... |
doesnt that show badly on microsoft rather than sony.Not letting people hear the review until the last minute or once the game is out sounds like their too scared of getting bad reviews

"They will know heghan belongs to the helghast"
"England expects that everyman will do his duty"
"we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender"

disolitude said:
I work in online advertising and have worked for sites and online publishers before. There is no money changing hands for reviews... Publishers have to follow review embargo dates and this could be why the Halo review is not out. However IGN is releasing it on Satuday...well before the game is out. So by Monday lots of reviews should be available. Anywho, I just find it suspicios when game gets reviewed a month early. Kinda like ..."here, you can review this early if you hype it up and make it seem like its the best game ever" |
are you suggesting that sony paid for the review?
generization without evidence i know but,... typically games that turn out great are released early so that great reviews can build up some hype. games that turn out bad have a review embargo so bad reviews don't turn off day 1 buyers. take that how you will.
^ Its halo, how is it supose to get bad reviews? Its like saying a Mario game will sell poorly on the Wii.
I don't know about online sites, but magazines receive your copy of the game until 1 month before release.
And G3 give Halo ODST an 9/10 (http://gogaminggiant.com/2009/09/17/halo-3-odst-review-2/).
GREAT SCORE
is it so difficult for people to accept the score instead of dissing the website/reviewer & score just because uncharted 2 got 10/10?