| non-gravity said: You definately made this thread before. You don't HAVE to like the game. |
I know but chek what happend to my other thread yesterday:
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=85803&page=1
Take my love, take my land..
| non-gravity said: You definately made this thread before. You don't HAVE to like the game. |
I know but chek what happend to my other thread yesterday:
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=85803&page=1
Take my love, take my land..
Got it because I was starving for an RPG to play this gen, but found it to be pretty average overall. I can see why people really enjoyed the game, but there were a lot of subtle issues that bugged me. I definitely LOVED the canvas art-style. The battle system was pretty good, but then the time-based ranking REALLY irked me. Kinda disappointing when some missions give you better marks for running through mass fire like a moron to the checkpoints. Who you bring into battle is somewhat hampered by command points. The plot was solid, but was also hamstrung by really generic dialogue.
Nevertheless, I bought the game for 35 dollars so it was worth it IMO, just nothing mind-blowing.
Valkyria Chronicles is one of the best videogames that ever created 100% perfect

Carl2291 said:
I wont comment on the rest, its your opinion... But i HEAVILY disagree with your opinion |
Well, I don't understand the complaints about realism. They drafted everyone 15 and up, and in your squad you had quite a diversified unit of individuals that were all quite different from each other.