No, I'm curious because we might be able to figure out if you're the sane cop or not.
Honestly, how have you exposed me? All you've said is that you're a cop and then you haven't told anyone who you investigated!
No, I'm curious because we might be able to figure out if you're the sane cop or not.
Honestly, how have you exposed me? All you've said is that you're a cop and then you haven't told anyone who you investigated!
That Guy said:
Well I will continue to go with my axiom (at least early game) and state that in early game settings, No Two Mafia will vote against each other. It may be possible for a mafia to dogpile on a vote to appear more townie-like. So between Outlaw and RCTJunkie, based on their voting, they BOTH cannot be mafia. However, that's the only thing I can deduce. They can be one mafia and one townie, or two townies. All I really can conclude is that at least one of them is innocent. I am FOS on outlaw for his fruedian slip post. Its not conclusive evidence on him, but I think he does warrant a suspicious eye. |
Sorry for quoting myself, but its a way for me to keep track of everything without reading 20 pages of text at a time.
Wow so Outlaw and RCT died, meaning that they were both townies, and ALSO meaning that all we know is that the mafia are all still out there.
Looking back at yesterday, WoW lead the charge against outlaw and was wrong, and also suspected RCT, and was also wrong on that account. It sort of puts a couple things into perspective now, eh?
Anyways, now I am a little suspicious of those who quickly dogpiled and voted outlaw to be lynched.
ok now after reading like 80 more posts, we have Hatmoza vs. Insomniac for day 2, right?
Both are roleclaiming cop.
A mafia can easily false-roleclaim as cop, as he can "investigate" people and tell the townies what they want, i.e. the mafia-roleclaim-cop can say "X" is townie, and X would say "hey he's right, I AM townie" and thus gain the trust of X.
The possibility of two cops really does muddy things, because Zexen could have assigned just ONE cop, meaning that one is mafia and one is town. OR there could be TWO cops, in which both can legitimately claim town.
That Guy said:
Looking back at yesterday, WoW lead the charge against outlaw and was wrong, and also suspected RCT, and was also wrong on that account. It sort of puts a couple things into perspective now, eh? |
I said we should investigate them... not lynch them (in outlaw's case anyway). Totally outlaw's fault for still talking like he was mafia.
ok, well looking back AGAIN, WoW lead the initial charge against outlaw, but didn't commit to voting.
However, Insomniac was one of the first to vote for outlaw, even though he totally could have investigated outlaw instead. I would have understood if Insomniac would have voted "no lynch" or maybe waited until the end of the day to vote outlaw, but being the 1st or 2nd to vote does look un-cop like.
But then again, false-roleclaiming early on is a HUGE risk for a mafia to take.
That Guy said: ok, well looking back AGAIN, WoW lead the initial charge against outlaw, but didn't commit to voting. However, Insomniac was one of the first to vote for outlaw, even though he totally could have investigated outlaw instead. I would have understood if Insomniac would have voted "no lynch" or maybe waited until the end of the day to vote outlaw, but being the 1st or 2nd to vote does look un-cop like. But then again, false-roleclaiming early on is a HUGE risk for a mafia to take. |
I'm afraid that I had convinced myself that he was mafia at that point. I decided that I would vote for outlaw, and then I would investigate Gnizmo, who was the other person I suspected. Turns out that Gnizmo is town (unless I'm not a sane cop) and outlaw was innocent.
That Guy said: ok, well looking back AGAIN, WoW lead the initial charge against outlaw, but didn't commit to voting. However, Insomniac was one of the first to vote for outlaw, even though he totally could have investigated outlaw instead. I would have understood if Insomniac would have voted "no lynch" or maybe waited until the end of the day to vote outlaw, but being the 1st or 2nd to vote does look un-cop like. But then again, false-roleclaiming early on is a HUGE risk for a mafia to take. |
Not here in the bahamas... here we just jump to conclusions straight from the get go...
4 ≈ One
what I did was change my profile settings to "block out all signatures" and set my page view to 100 posts per page. It helps a lot, actually. now I can read through all the posts fairly quickly without clicking "next page" 27 times over
axumblade said: There's something that's just not sitting well with me in this...I'm going to reread everything that's happened thus far and rethink my vote (am I allowed to do so?) |
You can change your vote for the day at any time before the day ends.
Person | Voting To Remove ( Removed | Killed ) | Identity | |||||
Day 1 |
Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | Day 6 | ||
Khuutra |
RCTjunkie |
|
|||||
insomniac17 | outlawauron | ||||||
Words Of Wisdom | No Lynch | ||||||
Dgc1808 | outlawauron | ||||||
c03n3nj0 |
outlawauron | ||||||
dtewi |
outlawauron | |
|||||
Gnizmo | No Lynch | |
|||||
Falcon095 | outlawauron | ||||||
That Guy |
No vote |
||||||
hatmoza |
dtewi | insomniac17 | |||||
axumblade | No Lynch |
hatmoza | |||||
Soriku | No Lynch | No Lynch | |||||
outlawauron | dtewi | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | Townsfolk |
RCTjunkie | No vote | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | Townsfolk |
Wow, lots of new things to read since I left. I think I read a direct question towards me, lemme try to find it