BasilZero said:
darkknightkryta said: ^^Bahahahahahaha @Basil, they should never have given Cena the title in the first place... Cena vs Rock 2 was bad. |
Yep the first match last year was fine for what it represented. So much for a once in a lifetime match >_>.
Undertaker VS Punk came too early too - WM29 was bad overall.
|
To tell you the truth, I think they got lucky with Undertaker vs Punk. I know people weren't too happy, but I felt they did a great job with Paul Bearer's death with this story. They really showed how much "Undertaker" cared for "Paul Bearer" which I liked. So timing for that was good (Sad he died though), plus I don't think anyone else but Punk could have made the angle good. Ignoring the once in a lifetime match idea, the overall match was terrible. Rock can't wrestle unless he has someone carrying him, and Cena can't carry a match. Very mismatched. What they should have done, was have Punk win at Rumble and then have Punk vs Rock at 'Mania. The lead up would have been great, Punk would have been able to carry the promo leading up to Wrestlemania, since Rock wasn't available for anything the month before and the days leading up. It would have been fresh, and we would have had pissed Rock vs Punk which would have been pretty damn good. Have Rock with at 'Mania and it's all she wrote. Instead we got a train wreak of a Wrestlemania. Next year's 'Mania isn't even at Madison Square Gardens. It's breaking tradition which is annoying (1, 10, 20 were at MSG).