By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Man carries assault rifle to Obama protest -- and it's legal

dtewi on 17 August 2009
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
It has to do with liberals having an anti gun policy.

Or maybe it has to do with the fact that SOMEONE BROUGHT AN ASSAULT RIFLE TO A PROTEST GROUP.

Assault rifle and protest? Doesn't spell good things.

It seems like a crappy way to express the second amendment.

It's still his right.

Yes, it is. But don't you think that bringing an ASSAULT RIFLE, not just a regular handgun, to a protest against Obama is stepping over the line?

I'm not going to say that it helps the whole redneck with a gun view. However, if it is within the law, then he has done nothing wrong.

230 years ago, George Washington owned hundreds of slaves. Are you saying that since it was within the law he did nothing wrong?

This is not a comparison, but it is to shoot down that ridiculous argument.

Here we go again. Just because you don't like my answer don't call it ridiculous. It makes you seem rather unintelligent.

I'm calling your answer ridiculous because it is ridiculous.

And do not try to the avoid the subject of this. Since owning slaves was in the law, anyone owning them did nothing wrong?



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

Around the Network
sguy78 on 17 August 2009
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
It has to do with liberals having an anti gun policy.

Or maybe it has to do with the fact that SOMEONE BROUGHT AN ASSAULT RIFLE TO A PROTEST GROUP.

Assault rifle and protest? Doesn't spell good things.

It seems like a crappy way to express the second amendment.

It's still his right.

Yes, it is. But don't you think that bringing an ASSAULT RIFLE, not just a regular handgun, to a protest against Obama is stepping over the line?

I'm not going to say that it helps the whole redneck with a gun view. However, if it is within the law, then he has done nothing wrong.

230 years ago, George Washington owned hundreds of slaves. Are you saying that since it was within the law he did nothing wrong?

This is not a comparison, but it is to shoot down that ridiculous argument.

Here we go again. Just because you don't like my answer don't call it ridiculous. It makes you seem rather unintelligent.

I'm calling your answer ridiculous because it is ridiculous.

And do not try to the avoid the subject of this. Since owning slaves was in the law, anyone owning them did nothing wrong?

You are changing the subject by bringing up a completely unrelated subject. There is nothing wrong with someone bearing arms. Grow up.



outlawauron on 17 August 2009
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
It has to do with liberals having an anti gun policy.

Or maybe it has to do with the fact that SOMEONE BROUGHT AN ASSAULT RIFLE TO A PROTEST GROUP.

Assault rifle and protest? Doesn't spell good things.

It seems like a crappy way to express the second amendment.

It's still his right.

Yes, it is. But don't you think that bringing an ASSAULT RIFLE, not just a regular handgun, to a protest against Obama is stepping over the line?

I'm not going to say that it helps the whole redneck with a gun view. However, if it is within the law, then he has done nothing wrong.

230 years ago, George Washington owned hundreds of slaves. Are you saying that since it was within the law he did nothing wrong?

This is not a comparison, but it is to shoot down that ridiculous argument.

Here we go again. Just because you don't like my answer don't call it ridiculous. It makes you seem rather unintelligent.

I'm calling your answer ridiculous because it is ridiculous.

And do not try to the avoid the subject of this. Since owning slaves was in the law, anyone owning them did nothing wrong?

While I don't think owning slaves was a good thing, I also believe it was a necessary evil at that time.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

dtewi on 17 August 2009
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
It has to do with liberals having an anti gun policy.

Or maybe it has to do with the fact that SOMEONE BROUGHT AN ASSAULT RIFLE TO A PROTEST GROUP.

Assault rifle and protest? Doesn't spell good things.

It seems like a crappy way to express the second amendment.

It's still his right.

Yes, it is. But don't you think that bringing an ASSAULT RIFLE, not just a regular handgun, to a protest against Obama is stepping over the line?

I'm not going to say that it helps the whole redneck with a gun view. However, if it is within the law, then he has done nothing wrong.

230 years ago, George Washington owned hundreds of slaves. Are you saying that since it was within the law he did nothing wrong?

This is not a comparison, but it is to shoot down that ridiculous argument.

Here we go again. Just because you don't like my answer don't call it ridiculous. It makes you seem rather unintelligent.

I'm calling your answer ridiculous because it is ridiculous.

And do not try to the avoid the subject of this. Since owning slaves was in the law, anyone owning them did nothing wrong?

You are changing the subject by bringing up a completely unrelated subject. There is nothing wrong with someone bearing arms. Grow up.

I am not. It relates to your idea that saying since it is in the law he did nothing wrong.

Is everything in the law OK to do? Is everything ever signed into law acceptable and there is nothing wrong with it?



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

Dodece on 17 August 2009

The irony is that people doing this are really being counter productive. All they are doing is scaring people away from their cause into the oppositions camp. It is one thing to be for gun rights until you are two feet away from someone that is heavily armed in the middle of the crowd, and then you realize you are really just one forgotten pill away from getting your head blown away.

By the way the liberal bias isn't against guns. Their biases are against concealable weapons, and assault weaponry. Both of which are really only used for killing people. You don't hunt game with either, and neither are terribly effective for home defense. Honestly in a world full of psychopaths and morons such as these individuals I am leaning towards laws banning these things being a very necessary evil.

This is just stupid really fucking stupid. The only thing they have accomplished is to look like your common street thugs, and to get local lawmakers to consider passing legislation against the behavior. I don't care how conservative your state is. Being the least bit pragmatic tells you that your economy is going to hurt when people are afraid to come to your state, because you let citizens carry automatic weapons into large crowds of people. Do these people have no shame, or hell any common sense whatsoever.



http://live.xbox.com/member/Dodece

Around the Network
sguy78 on 17 August 2009
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
It has to do with liberals having an anti gun policy.

Or maybe it has to do with the fact that SOMEONE BROUGHT AN ASSAULT RIFLE TO A PROTEST GROUP.

Assault rifle and protest? Doesn't spell good things.

It seems like a crappy way to express the second amendment.

It's still his right.

Yes, it is. But don't you think that bringing an ASSAULT RIFLE, not just a regular handgun, to a protest against Obama is stepping over the line?

I'm not going to say that it helps the whole redneck with a gun view. However, if it is within the law, then he has done nothing wrong.

230 years ago, George Washington owned hundreds of slaves. Are you saying that since it was within the law he did nothing wrong?

This is not a comparison, but it is to shoot down that ridiculous argument.

Here we go again. Just because you don't like my answer don't call it ridiculous. It makes you seem rather unintelligent.

I'm calling your answer ridiculous because it is ridiculous.

And do not try to the avoid the subject of this. Since owning slaves was in the law, anyone owning them did nothing wrong?

You are changing the subject by bringing up a completely unrelated subject. There is nothing wrong with someone bearing arms. Grow up.

I am not. It relates to your idea that saying since it is in the law he did nothing wrong.

Is everything in the law OK to do? Is everything ever signed into law acceptable and there is nothing wrong with it?

There is nothing wrong with an individual's right to bear arms. Stop putting words in my mouth.



dtewi on 17 August 2009
sguy78 said:

I'm not going to say that it helps the whole redneck with a gun view. However, if it is within the law, then he has done nothing wrong.


I'm not putting it in your mouth. You said it right here. Multiple posts have been wasted to get a straight answer from you. Answer the question.

Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

sguy78 on 17 August 2009
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:

I'm not going to say that it helps the whole redneck with a gun view. However, if it is within the law, then he has done nothing wrong.

I'm not putting it in your mouth. You said it right here. Multiple posts have been wasted to get a straight answer from you. Answer the question.

You are doing exactly that. I never said every law is great. Keep on trying pal.



dtewi on 17 August 2009
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:

I'm not going to say that it helps the whole redneck with a gun view. However, if it is within the law, then he has done nothing wrong.

I'm not putting it in your mouth. You said it right here. Multiple posts have been wasted to get a straight answer from you. Answer the question.

You are doing exactly that. I never said every law is great. Keep on trying pal.


No, you said if. If implies that any law is morally and socially acceptable. It is right there, and yet you still have not answered my question. Do we have to waste 5 pages before I get an answer?

Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

sguy78 on 17 August 2009
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:

I'm not going to say that it helps the whole redneck with a gun view. However, if it is within the law, then he has done nothing wrong.

I'm not putting it in your mouth. You said it right here. Multiple posts have been wasted to get a straight answer from you. Answer the question.

You are doing exactly that. I never said every law is great. Keep on trying pal.

No, you said if. If implies that any law is morally and socially acceptable. It is right there, and yet you still have not answered my question. Do we have to waste 5 pages before I get an answer?

I never implied any law is acceptable. Do you like to make up arguments for no reason?