Man carries assault rifle to Obama protest -- and it's legal

[dtewi]

sguy78 said:

dtewi said:

sguy78 said:

dtewi said:

sguy78 said:

dtewi said:

sguy78 said:

dtewi said:

sguy78 said:
It has to do with liberals having an anti gun policy.

Or maybe it has to do with the fact that SOMEONE BROUGHT AN ASSAULT RIFLE TO A PROTEST GROUP.

Assault rifle and protest? Doesn't spell good things.

It seems like a crappy way to express the second amendment.

It's still his right.

Yes, it is. But don't you think that bringing an ASSAULT RIFLE, not just a regular handgun, to a protest against Obama is stepping over the line?

I'm not going to say that it helps the whole redneck with a gun view. However, if it is within the law, then he has done nothing wrong.

230 years ago, George Washington owned hundreds of slaves. Are you saying that since it was within the law he did nothing wrong?

This is not a comparison, but it is to shoot down that ridiculous argument.

Here we go again. Just because you don't like my answer don't call it ridiculous. It makes you seem rather unintelligent.

I'm calling your answer ridiculous because it is ridiculous.

And do not try to the avoid the subject of this. Since owning slaves was in the law, anyone owning them did nothing wrong?

You are changing the subject by bringing up a completely unrelated subject. There is nothing wrong with someone bearing arms. Grow up.

I am not. It relates to your idea that saying since it is in the law he did nothing wrong.

Is everything in the law OK to do? Is everything ever signed into law acceptable and there is nothing wrong with it?