By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Man carries assault rifle to Obama protest -- and it's legal

vgchartzgirl on 17 August 2009

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/08/17/obama.protest.rifle/

That's just crazy, I mean, I know people are exercising their right to bear arms, but it just seems wrong.  I mean, you never saw anyone (not to my knowledge) that carried an assualt rifle to a Bush speech, and nobody really liked him toward the end of his term.  I mean, what is it about Obama that people seem to loose their marbles over.  His race?  His policies? 



Around the Network
sguy78 on 17 August 2009

It has to do with liberals having an anti gun policy.



dtewi on 17 August 2009
sguy78 said:
It has to do with liberals having an anti gun policy.

Or maybe it has to do with the fact that SOMEONE BROUGHT AN ASSAULT RIFLE TO A PROTEST GROUP.

Assault rifle and protest? Doesn't spell good things.

It seems like a crappy way to express the second amendment.



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

Xxain on 17 August 2009

I haven't been keepin up...wats this Obama rage recently????



sguy78 on 17 August 2009
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
It has to do with liberals having an anti gun policy.

Or maybe it has to do with the fact that SOMEONE BROUGHT AN ASSAULT RIFLE TO A PROTEST GROUP.

Assault rifle and protest? Doesn't spell good things.

It seems like a crappy way to express the second amendment.

It's still his right.



Around the Network
dtewi on 17 August 2009
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
It has to do with liberals having an anti gun policy.

Or maybe it has to do with the fact that SOMEONE BROUGHT AN ASSAULT RIFLE TO A PROTEST GROUP.

Assault rifle and protest? Doesn't spell good things.

It seems like a crappy way to express the second amendment.

It's still his right.

Yes, it is. But don't you think that bringing an ASSAULT RIFLE, not just a regular handgun, to a protest against Obama is stepping over the line?



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

outlawauron on 17 August 2009

lol, this is too good!



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

sguy78 on 17 August 2009
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
It has to do with liberals having an anti gun policy.

Or maybe it has to do with the fact that SOMEONE BROUGHT AN ASSAULT RIFLE TO A PROTEST GROUP.

Assault rifle and protest? Doesn't spell good things.

It seems like a crappy way to express the second amendment.

It's still his right.

Yes, it is. But don't you think that bringing an ASSAULT RIFLE, not just a regular handgun, to a protest against Obama is stepping over the line?

I'm not going to say that it helps the whole redneck with a gun view. However, if it is within the law, then he has done nothing wrong.



dtewi on 17 August 2009
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
It has to do with liberals having an anti gun policy.

Or maybe it has to do with the fact that SOMEONE BROUGHT AN ASSAULT RIFLE TO A PROTEST GROUP.

Assault rifle and protest? Doesn't spell good things.

It seems like a crappy way to express the second amendment.

It's still his right.

Yes, it is. But don't you think that bringing an ASSAULT RIFLE, not just a regular handgun, to a protest against Obama is stepping over the line?

I'm not going to say that it helps the whole redneck with a gun view. However, if it is within the law, then he has done nothing wrong.

230 years ago, George Washington owned hundreds of slaves. Are you saying that since it was within the law he did nothing wrong?

This is not a comparison, but it is to shoot down that ridiculous argument.



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

sguy78 on 17 August 2009
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
dtewi said:
sguy78 said:
It has to do with liberals having an anti gun policy.

Or maybe it has to do with the fact that SOMEONE BROUGHT AN ASSAULT RIFLE TO A PROTEST GROUP.

Assault rifle and protest? Doesn't spell good things.

It seems like a crappy way to express the second amendment.

It's still his right.

Yes, it is. But don't you think that bringing an ASSAULT RIFLE, not just a regular handgun, to a protest against Obama is stepping over the line?

I'm not going to say that it helps the whole redneck with a gun view. However, if it is within the law, then he has done nothing wrong.

230 years ago, George Washington owned hundreds of slaves. Are you saying that since it was within the law he did nothing wrong?

This is not a comparison, but it is to shoot down that ridiculous argument.

Here we go again. Just because you don't like my answer don't call it ridiculous. It makes you seem rather unintelligent.