By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Will more cashflow get Nintendo to release a graphically = system next gen?

No. They'll focus on something that matters.



Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita

Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte

Sugu yoko de waratteita

Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo

I will never leave you

Around the Network

No they will just keep there style.



 

   PROUD MEMBER OF THE PLAYSTATION 3 : RPG FAN CLUB

 

CommunistHater said:
PS3 went overboard with the unbalanced tech. 360 got it just right. Wii is weaker than Xbox one

maybe from a biased gamer's perspective, microsoft did everything perfectly. but it's is pretty much in the same boat as sony in terms of making money in the gaming division.

 

bolded: prove it.



"From everything I hear, Nintendo made the decision to focus less on the graphical power of the Wii out of necessity. They simply could not compete on the same playing field that Microsoft and Sony were fighting on with the limited resources they had."

I do not believe this. I believe the decision to make the Wii only slightly more powerful than the Gamecube was entirely because Nintendo saw no advantage to putting out a high-powered beast.



This is invisible text!

EntilZha said:
To say the Wii is not as powerful as the other two console because Nintendo "could not compete" with MS and Sony is wrong, in my opinion. This is how I see the events leading up to Wii.
Nintendo realized there is a relatively small number of "core" gamers out there, and all 3 console makers are trying to get their business. If all three make similar consoles, there are only so many "core" gamers to go around. Nintendo decided to go after people that either do not game anymore, or never gamed. That is a big untapped market that are mostly intimidated by the high tech consoles with the million button controllers. However, how to get these people interested? It has to be affordable, it has to look easy to play, and it has to have a "hook" that can not be found on any other console. Whether you like the Wii or not, you have to admit it was a stroke of genius. Gaming has never been more mainstream. MS and Sony should thank Nintendo. Many of the new gamers that start off with just a Wii have branched out to try the others as well. More gamers is good for all console manufacturers.


I think Nintendo chose the lower tech because the Wii remote and motion control was a huge risk that they didn't know would pay off.

 

They know it works, they dominated the market, they will definitely throw some money into the hardware this time around since odds are  weill be seeing a modification of the wii remote for the next generation, less R&D towards control and more towards the hardware and other features.

 

dtewi said:
No. They'll focus on something that matters.

I disagree, while graphics may not be necesarry for a great game (as shown by the excellent titles from previous generatiosn that are still amazing to play), they do matter for support, sadly. Noone can deny that one of the major reasons why the Wii is getting so few high profile games is because of hardware limitations. If the Wii had simialr power to the 360, we wouldn't see developers giving it the shaft as often as they have.



Around the Network
CommunistHater said:
Sony went overboard with the unbalanced tech. 360 got it just right. Wii is weaker than Xbox one

The Wii is not weaker than the original Xbox. Why was that comment even necessary here?



9Chiba said:
CommunistHater said:
PS3 went overboard with the unbalanced tech. 360 got it just right. Wii is weaker than Xbox one

maybe from a biased gamer's perspective, microsoft did everything perfectly. but it's is pretty much in the same boat as sony in terms of making money in the gaming division.

 

bolded: prove it.

Xbox One has more Flops then Wii :  Look it up



Repent or be destroyed

Soriku said:
CommunistHater said:
Sony went overboard with the unbalanced tech. 360 got it just right. Wii is weaker than Xbox one


Uh...the PS3 and 360 are about the same in technical prowess. And Wii is stronger than the Xbox.

Next gen Nintendo will probably make a console a bit stronger than the HD consoles this gen and make better online functions, add in their own new cway of playing to "disrupt the market" and just release it. Since the Wii's #1 this gen it'll probably get good games from the get-go. Plus it'll be HD finally so devs shouldn't complain.

The real question is will Wii HD go native 1080p.



Repent or be destroyed

The next Nintendo console will be HD for sure, but I bet they will still try to be the lowest priced console, at least at launch. Everybody dreams of driving a Lexus, but most of us will be happy with a Camry. Which model do you think sells the most? I think it would be a mistake to follow Sony's path of launching a super powerful machine that many can not afford.



In the absence of evidence to the contrary, always assume you have the upper hand.

NNID = RangerOne

Switch = SW-2393-3671-6907

Here's what I think will happen. Nintendo will release a console that's basically an 360/PS3 1.5. It's price point will be $200-300 and it will still turn a profit, albeit probably minimal, but a profit nonetheless. Graphically speaking, we're almost near the point where it's pointless to try and push the envelope any further. I was content with the PS2 graphics, and only "graphic-whores" will care for anything more than this generation. They'll probably stick to the same architecture they have now, but with multiple cores/threads wtfe you want to call them. That's what I'd do anyways if I were in charge of R&D for Nintendo and wanted to continue in the right direction with Wii2/Wii HD :P