By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Should There Be A Winner?

SciFiBoy said:
trashleg said:
SciFiBoy said:
trashleg said:
i think party politics is getting old. i know that sounds crazy but it doesnt seem to be doing much good. we need a sort of all for one and one for all --> aimed at making life good for everyone with minimal involvement kinda attitude.

but im tired so ignore me.

depends what you mean by minimal involvment, lol


as for is politics getting old, i think its more that we have an 19th century political system in a 21st century world, it needs modernistaion on almost every front and level.

well before WW2 the government was nowhere near as intimately involved in people's lives as it is now. at the time its what was needed, and people appreciated it.. but then they got used to it and it just sort of stuck, i guess.

it does need a complete overhaul. whats scary is that we're the generation who have to do it! scary cos i still feel so young lol

hmm, before WW2, i dont know about that

im 20, i hope very much to be part of the generation that overhauls politics, lol, dont know how easy it will be, but thats why im applying to do a politics course in september, my ultimate aim is to get a degree in it.

It was pre-WW2 that the Liberal party were very popular. WW2 changed people's perceptions, however. It pulled people together, and it built up greater sense of community, and people started voting more left-wing, and so Labour become a whole load more powerful.

The problem was, that although Labour are an economically left-wing party, they're also more authoritarian than the other mainstream parties out there, and so the Government started to play more of a role in people's lives, as trashleg put it (though I'm not 100% agreeing with this, myself).



Around the Network

You can't force people to vote. Dictatorships and puppet regimes do that.

If someone does not choose to vote, then they've mandated that they do not care to be represented by a person of his or her peers.

If 6% of the population vote in a free and fair election, than their will is the will of the people. If people cannot be motivated to vote, that is their own lazy, stupid fault.



Back from the dead, I'm afraid.

trashleg said:
SciFiBoy said:

hmm, before WW2, i dont know about that

im 20, i hope very much to be part of the generation that overhauls politics, lol, dont know how easy it will be, but thats why im applying to do a politics course in september, my ultimate aim is to get a degree in it.

very honourable, im 20 too and its funny, i just dont see how knowing how its been done in the past is gonna help us improve the future - i know you're gonna shout at me for that but its not a dig at you learning politics. i thought about going into it.

i think what we need is a bunch of people who have the nation's wellbeing and best interests at heart. people with good intentions and honest souls.

 

now, where the hell are we gonna fnd a bunch of people like that?

im more intrested in learning how its done and works now, its like this: you have to know what the problem is before you can fix it, and although i have a rough idea, i want to know more, so i can do more,

i go beyond that, i like to think i have humanitys best intrests and wellbeing at heat, to do whats right to make the human race better.




SamuelRSmith said:
SciFiBoy said:

hmm, before WW2, i dont know about that

im 20, i hope very much to be part of the generation that overhauls politics, lol, dont know how easy it will be, but thats why im applying to do a politics course in september, my ultimate aim is to get a degree in it.

It was pre-WW2 that the Liberal party were very popular. WW2 changed people's perceptions, however. It pulled people together, and it built up greater sense of community, and people started voting more left-wing, and so Labour become a whole load more powerful.

The problem was, that although Labour are an economically left-wing party, they're also more authoritarian than the other mainstream parties out there, and so the Government started to play more of a role in people's lives, as trashleg put it (though I'm not 100% agreeing with this, myself).

thats the impression i get of Labour aswel, lol, although they even gave up the ecenomic stuff under blair!



SciFiBoy said:
SamuelRSmith said:
SciFiBoy said:

hmm, before WW2, i dont know about that

im 20, i hope very much to be part of the generation that overhauls politics, lol, dont know how easy it will be, but thats why im applying to do a politics course in september, my ultimate aim is to get a degree in it.

It was pre-WW2 that the Liberal party were very popular. WW2 changed people's perceptions, however. It pulled people together, and it built up greater sense of community, and people started voting more left-wing, and so Labour become a whole load more powerful.

The problem was, that although Labour are an economically left-wing party, they're also more authoritarian than the other mainstream parties out there, and so the Government started to play more of a role in people's lives, as trashleg put it (though I'm not 100% agreeing with this, myself).

thats the impression i get of Labour aswel, lol, although they even gave up the ecenomic stuff under blair!

Well, they had to, else they would suffer the same fate as the Liberal party.

The fact of the matter is, the Labour party does better off of the working class. Since 1950, the working class has halved in proportion (it used to make up 2/3s of the electorate, now it only makes up 1/3). Labour didn't always win elections when the working class was so large, they would have no chance now under the old Labour, as much as it pains me to say it.

There's a reason why Margaret Thatcher lasted so long, and why Major kept on Conservative rule until the Blair reforms, and that reason is that Old Labour became weak, and they were unwanted by the electorate.



Around the Network

Yes, there should definitly be a winner. If people cant be bothered to vote then thats there own problem when X is voted in instead. They only have themselves to blame. Also its unfair on the people that did actually vote.



SamuelRSmith said:
SciFiBoy said:

thats the impression i get of Labour aswel, lol, although they even gave up the ecenomic stuff under blair!

Well, they had to, else they would suffer the same fate as the Liberal party.

The fact of the matter is, the Labour party does better off of the working class. Since 1950, the working class has halved in proportion (it used to make up 2/3s of the electorate, now it only makes up 1/3). Labour didn't always win elections when the working class was so large, they would have no chance now under the old Labour, as much as it pains me to say it.

There's a reason why Margaret Thatcher lasted so long, and why Major kept on Conservative rule until the Blair reforms, and that reason is that Old Labour became weak, and they were unwanted by the electorate.

i dont know, i think there are more liberal people in the uk than you think, if there was a party like old labour, but with a better leader and a better understanding of there idealogy and how they would implement it and how it would benefit people, i think they could win an election.



i struggle to really relate to any one party. its sad. i would say most people ever want something different to everyone else though, its rare for even two people to agree on everything. which is why sometimes i thnk party politics is odd... i dunno.


samuel, il reply to your wall post tomorrow. im too tired to read all those words.



Highwaystar101 said: trashleg said that if I didn't pay back the money she leant me, she would come round and break my legs... That's why people call her trashleg, because she trashes the legs of the people she loan sharks money to.
SciFiBoy said:
SamuelRSmith said:
SciFiBoy said:

thats the impression i get of Labour aswel, lol, although they even gave up the ecenomic stuff under blair!

Well, they had to, else they would suffer the same fate as the Liberal party.

The fact of the matter is, the Labour party does better off of the working class. Since 1950, the working class has halved in proportion (it used to make up 2/3s of the electorate, now it only makes up 1/3). Labour didn't always win elections when the working class was so large, they would have no chance now under the old Labour, as much as it pains me to say it.

There's a reason why Margaret Thatcher lasted so long, and why Major kept on Conservative rule until the Blair reforms, and that reason is that Old Labour became weak, and they were unwanted by the electorate.

i dont know, i think there are more liberal people in the uk than you think, if there was a party like old labour, but with a better leader and a better understanding of there idealogy and how they would implement it and how it would benefit people, i think they could win an election.

I seriously doubt it, myself. And I think the odds will be greatly stacked away from Labour in the future.

If it wasn't for Scotland and Wales, England wouldn't have had a Labour Government EVER until 1997 (and even that wasn't until the Blair reforms). And now, the Conservatives are making massive gains in Wales, and parties like the SNP are taking Labour votes in Scotland.

What's more, there's been a lot of talk recently about shrinking the number of MPs. This will be done by lowering the number of seats, particularly in inner-city areas and in Wales and Scotland - both of which are typically more pro-Labour, and as such, this kind of move will weaken the party even further.

Also, David Cameron has promised to look into the West Lothian Question when the Tories get into Government - this will weaken the powers of Scottish MPs, and thus weakening the power of any Labour whip, or something like that, on many English-only issues.

It doesn't look good for New Labour, atm, let alone 'old' Labour.



SamuelRSmith said:
SciFiBoy said:
SamuelRSmith said:
SciFiBoy said:

thats the impression i get of Labour aswel, lol, although they even gave up the ecenomic stuff under blair!

Well, they had to, else they would suffer the same fate as the Liberal party.

The fact of the matter is, the Labour party does better off of the working class. Since 1950, the working class has halved in proportion (it used to make up 2/3s of the electorate, now it only makes up 1/3). Labour didn't always win elections when the working class was so large, they would have no chance now under the old Labour, as much as it pains me to say it.

There's a reason why Margaret Thatcher lasted so long, and why Major kept on Conservative rule until the Blair reforms, and that reason is that Old Labour became weak, and they were unwanted by the electorate.

i dont know, i think there are more liberal people in the uk than you think, if there was a party like old labour, but with a better leader and a better understanding of there idealogy and how they would implement it and how it would benefit people, i think they could win an election.

I seriously doubt it, myself. And I think the odds will be greatly stacked away from Labour in the future.

If it wasn't for Scotland and Wales, England wouldn't have had a Labour Government EVER until 1997 (and even that wasn't until the Blair reforms). And now, the Conservatives are making massive gains in Wales, and parties like the SNP are taking Labour votes in Scotland.

What's more, there's been a lot of talk recently about shrinking the number of MPs. This will be done by lowering the number of seats, particularly in inner-city areas and in Wales and Scotland - both of which are typically more pro-Labour, and as such, this kind of move will weaken the party even further.

Also, David Cameron has promised to look into the West Lothian Question when the Tories get into Government - this will weaken the powers of Scottish MPs, and thus weakening the power of any Labour whip, or something like that, on many English-only issues.

It doesn't look good for New Labour, atm, let alone 'old' Labour.

ok, what about another party with Liberal ecenomic views? or social views even?

btw, if Labour do diminish significantly, wouldnt that make us a de-facto dictatorship? as only the Conservatives would get in, no-one else seems to vote for 3rd partys, even the Lib Dems dont look like getting anywhere near being elected?