@theprof00
I will dispel your points which are debatable with simple direct logic. You aren't necessarily wrong in conclusion, but marketing is a response to absolute necessity. More exclusives are a response to the console being more viable specifically in Japan. Cost reductions are where everyone is tripping. They are not linear in nature. You can lose cost reductions, and in fact the price of production can actually go up.
I know I just lost a few people. Before you throw a tantrum hear me out. Cost reduction has three legs upon which it stands. Those are components, design, and efficiency. The last is actually the most important. Unless efficiency is increasing or at least optimal then you have two problems components begin to accumulate liquidity, and decreased production actually increases production cost per unit. Say you can build ten consoles an hour, but now you are only allowed to make six consoles. You will still be paid as if you made ten consoles.
Why am I going on about this. Sony is not meeting projections in fact they are down year over year. So they must actually produce fewer consoles, or they must produce as many consoles or more, and then stock pile them. Either way Sony must actually be losing money on the console side of the equation. Either the reductions have slid to a stand still, or they are locking up cash in a warehouse. Either way they still must account.
Basically Sony being down year over year is all the proof you should need. It precludes any effective cost reductions, and as you pointed out Sony has actually had to spend more to maintain current diminished sales. All of this before you can even begin to think about research and development costs.









