Deutschland!!!!! Los!!!!!!!! 2-0, and it could have been at least 4 nothing. I don't think Australia is gonna give any type of a fight on the 2nd half
03/10/09 HUGE day in my life:
Germany best team so far, and by far.
- Our album on spotify https://open.spotify.com/album/56mEbEgyBYGzcDyZ1eMQ1v?si=hYKgir5YRSCrzywgGmV4oQ
- Our videoclip
- My manga: https://www.webtoons.com/en/challenge/blanca-the-world/list?title_no=313068
Germany's 2nd goal was the best goal yet. Meanwhile the first was utter bullshit. Even my blind grandmother saw the offsides, and they really really did not deserve that. Their victory will be absolutely hollow and undeserved.
| mirgro said: Germany's 2nd goal was the best goal yet. Meanwhile the first was utter bullshit. Even my blind grandmother saw the offsides, and they really really did not deserve that. Their victory will be absolutely hollow and undeserved. |
Actually Muller wasn't offside. The defense covering Klose on the center part of the goal area was putting Muller legally on play.
Current PC Build
CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"
lestatdark said:
|
Maybe you should really watch the replay. I didn't catch who it was, since I don't know futch all too well, on the top but he was definitely behind every defender, by a wide margin too. No one passed to him, but that doesn't matter, it's offsides as long as there is a pass while an attacker is behind the defenders.
mirgro said:
|
I'm watching the game, and the replay was passed here exhaustively, with a virtual offside line. There's a defender close to Klose on the center part of the area that's putting Muller onside. Since Klose isn't an active part of the play at that moment, it isn't considered offside.
For an attacker to be offside he has to be part of the play. Klose only became an equation once Muller did the cross, at which time he was behind Muller, which becomes the new offside line.
Fast Forward to 00:30 and pause there. Look at Muller's position and then look at the defender near Klose's position. This should dispel any doubts about the alleged offside.
Current PC Build
CPU - i7 8700K 3.7 GHz (4.7 GHz turbo) 6 cores OC'd to 5.2 GHz with Watercooling (Hydro Series H110i) | MB - Gigabyte Z370 HD3P ATX | Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC BLACK 11G (1657 MHz Boost Core / 11010 MHz Memory) | RAM - Corsair DIMM 32GB DDR4, 2400 MHz | PSU - Corsair CX650M (80+ Bronze) 650W | Audio - Asus Essence STX II 7.1 | Monitor - Samsung U28E590D 4K UHD, Freesync, 1 ms, 60 Hz, 28"
Wow another red card. Thats a red card in every game today. It seemed a bit harsh.
mirgro said:
|
You have got the off-side rule wrong that player wasn't interfering in play and so was not off-side.
lestatdark said:
I'm watching the game, and the replay was passed here exhaustively, with a virtual offside line. There's a defender close to Klose on the center part of the area that's putting Muller onside. Since Klose isn't an active part of the play at that moment, it isn't considered offside. Fast Forward to 00:30 and pause there. Look at Muller's position and then look at the defender near Klose's position. This should dispel any doubts about the alleged offside. |
That is false. For an offside it does not matter if the player is part of the play or not.
"A player is in an offside position if he is in his opponents' half of the field and is nearer to his opponents' goal line than both the ball and the next to last opponent."
As such, the german was committing offsides plain as day.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
