He hasn't won anything of consequence since Porto in 2004.
He hasn't won anything of consequence since Porto in 2004.
| tombi123 said: Jose Mourinho hasn't lost a home game in the league since 2004 with Porto. |
Refereeing decisions 
Although I will keep quite because of that Luis Garcia phantom goal in 2005 


FootballFan said:
Although I will keep quite because of that Luis Garcia phantom goal in 2005 |
Still... six years without loosing a single game at home in a league match... unbelievable.

| burning_phoneix said: He hasn't won anything of consequence since Porto in 2004. |
two premier leagues, two serie a's, fa cup, copa ittalia and champions league? all of no consequence?
OK, I'll give him the second champion's league but going to megabucks Chelsea is like someone using an infinite money code and claiming to be good. Winning Serie A with a team that won the past four titles in a row isn't that impressive.
| Star-Wars-Josh9 said: who thinks australia should get the world cup? |
^
No.
Would take most countries forever to get to
It's to way to hot
They don't have footballing tradition
They don't have enough big football stadiums
The stadiums would be half empty for some games (like South Africa)
Crocodiles roam the streets
The distance between major stadiums would be insane
Oh yeah, everything is stupidly expensive!


FootballFan said:
Would take most countries forever to get to Oh yeah, everything is stupidly expensive! |
where do you get your information from. all thet is basicly wrong exct that we dont ahve a strong football tridation. the travel distabce would be like if the usa got the world cup. australia have the mcg wich has 100 000 capicty and would do fine for the final it supports massive crowds ever year and wins. next time do some reasherch.
Star-Wars-Josh9 said:
where do you get your information from. all thet is basicly wrong exct that we dont ahve a strong football tridation. the travel distabce would be like if the usa got the world cup. australia have the mcg wich has 100 000 capicty and would do fine for the final it supports massive crowds ever year and wins. next time do some reasherch. |
Huh? I don't need to do research I know the facts.
Your correct it would also be a joke if USA got the world cup equally like it would if Australia got it. Travel times would be horrendous! You wouldn't even be able to drive by car to each stadium! England has roughly 40 big stadiums which are all above 30,000 in capacity. You can drive to any of them within 4 hours from a central point.
The kick off times would be ridiculous! Most of Europe wouldn't be able to stay up at 4.00am to spectate their teams, it's bad enough when England are playing rugby union/league over there!
Do you really think the bulk of fans (located within Europe) would be keen on making the 22 hour journey? I doubt it. Australia is really expensive as well. They import everything! Games for example. In England you can get new games for £20 a few months after release....It's rip off nation.
Also do you think that the native Australian population (most that don't even like football) would be keen on spectating a game between teams such as serbia slovenia nigeria and honduras? If i'm honest I don't think there is the interest. Even if the USA got the world cup there would likely fill every stadium. It;s a big advantage having 280 million more people.
As for the crocodiles, I don't even need to back up that claim 

