I didn't actually mean you, I just talked to you because you were defending the spoiler of angrypoolman

i know. according to forum rules i didnt spoil anything actually

also i never said that they should follow the book dead on, (why is it that people on forums always assume one extreme or the other?) but what i said was that it should be MORE like the book. less focusing on ron and that stupid bitch and little bit more story.

If you havent realized, movies are made to be interesting and make the company money. I personally would love to see a movie with every single detail from the book in the movie, because I am a huge Harry Potter fan but that will never happen. Most people watch the movie and dont give a fuck about the book. The movie is made to be interesting and to keep you on your toes etc. Most people find content from the book boaring.

And I take back my comment about spoling the movie. You did spoil the movie for me
"less focusing on ron and that stupid bitch and little bit more story."

Thanks,I'm going to see it tommorow knwoign that I will expect ron and hermonie on each other.

I just hate all the crap they changed.

SINCE WHEN DOES THE BURROW CATCH ON FUCKING FIRE?

I mean, seriously, that'll fuck up like a third of the last book, forcing MAJOR changes to the next two films.

I thoroughly enjoyed it. I've got nothing wrong with them changing the narrative since I've already read the books and I know how the story goes with regards to the written word. Its more exciting this way. As-long as the movie's capture the spirit of the book I'm happy. And I think the movie was successful in that regard.