AHAHAHAH ahahah AHHAHAHAH hahahahah sad how some1 had to say this.

the 360 controller and ps3 controller to me dont matter.

like i personally like the ps3 one because u have to grasp it and the symmetrical joy sticks. my friend likes the 360 because u dont grasp it u just iunno the exact word for it, clutch? and the fact that the one joystick is higher up.
i like the blue tooth, hes fine with his AA batteries.



anyways the reason y 360 is doing so well is because its got the games. if gears was multiplat and all they had was halo, sales would be a bit less for 360 and a bit more for ps3, we all know that its commen sense. however, Sony has a few titles to combat xbox now. Uncharted 2. MAN IT LOOKS GOOD. that'll rival gears. they were hoping killzone would rival halo but it released at a bad time. people dont realize the ps3 is already 200 and in some places 300 dollars cheaper. like, i think i got my 360 for 399. maybe it was 299 but i doubt it. how much was it when halo came out cause thats when i got mine.

i agree with the fact that most 360 versions of multiplat games are just simply better than their ps3 counterparts. but i do see that he is being very defensive.

My Dreamcast controller looks so similar to my Xbox controller.

I had the original Xbox....and I have an Xbox 360 right now. And it's not rubbish. Look at the design. They're damn near identical. Button layouts, D-pad, analog, shoulder triggers. The only difference are A. Black and white buttons became shoulder buttons B. Placement of start and selct and C. The bottom of the controller on the 360 is *slightly* more contoured than the original. The "feeling" of the controller is pretty much the same though.

@deathgod

In many situations, yes, 360 multiplats are better. But they don't need to show a video of the PS3 version of a game being worse than....the PS3 version or, like in the case of Wolverine, claim a part where the game looks shoddy to be the PS3 version, even though there's an "A" button on the screen. All the while claiming to not be biased. This guy talking about the controller as the reason why the 360 versions score better is him deviating from the root of people's complaints. If a 360 version is better, SHOW US THAT IT'S BETTER. Don't show a bad spot in the 360 version and claim it to be the PS3. Don't show two PS3 versions running side by side, and have a spot in the game where the PS3 runs well to be claimed as the 360 version. And definitely don't ignore the above situation and say that it's the controller that makes the 360 version better.

If what he said about the controller is true, then every multiplatform game on the Gamecube should be scored as if the game was utter and complete shit

Nah, you should expect that he would be mature enough.

Oh yes Sony needs to match the story telling prowess represented in Gears of War and Halo 3 and stop having story-less exclusives like Uncharted and Valkyria Chronicles.

I can't say anything about the 360 controller but I can say this.. The analog sticks on the SIXAXIS are the worst quality sticks since the N64. They become so loose and floaty so quickly that it's ridiculous. I go from playing IR precision MP3 to loose and floaty CoD4 and just think wtf.

Perhaps Sony have fixed this issue with the DS3?

Ummmm... GT bias confirmed?

Sounds like a fanboy rant to me, but i respect GT comprasions more than eurogamer comprasions

Haha, just to summarise his statement

"My site does not troll the PS3 - it's not trolling because it's true. The PS3 is shit and that's why we call it shit"

Grow up, gaming journalists