By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Gametrailers responds to the contreversy revolving the PS360 comparisons

ultraslick on 12 July 2009

The fact that he goes out of his way to point out how Microsoft has a greater selection of exclusive games is funny to me.

Someone may like Halo and Gears and other Microsoft exclusives better than what Sony has to offer, but the fact still remains that Sony's exclusive devs and franchises far far outreach those of Microsoft.

Preferences aside, this is Sony's strength.. their 1st and 2nd party developers.
I almost wonder if he wrote that entire thing as a joke.

The idea that he was trying to prove isn't ridiculous, but he focused on seemingly arbitrary personal preferences that really don't have any leverage on the experience of the games themselves.



̶3̶R̶D̶   2ND! Place has never been so sweet.


Around the Network
blazinhead89 on 12 July 2009

lol?



gameover on 12 July 2009

lol as much as u want
im talking about facts and the fact is
the image quality output in most ps3 games is substandard (lower than 720p resolution) and not what sony was advertising 2 years before the ps3 release. the first controller that boomerang shit would be a much better choice in the end but they dropped it.. they are afraid to innovate. and now they want motion contols?? give me a break
the company became a joke
their last mistake was not to include a touch screen or a 2nd analog in the psp go
i have ps1 ps2 psp ps3 (but sold it)
im not biased and not a fanboy but sony is not delivering their promises this gen



Carl on 12 July 2009
gameover said:
lol as much as u want
im talking about facts and the fact is
the image quality output in most ps3 games is substandard (lower than 720p resolution) and not what sony was advertising 2 years before the ps3 release. the first controller that boomerang shit would be a much better choice in the end but they dropped it.. they are afraid to innovate. and now they want motion contols?? give me a break
the company became a joke
their last mistake was not to include a touch screen or a 2nd analog in the psp go
i have ps1 ps2 psp ps3 (but sold it)
im not biased and not a fanboy but sony is not delivering their promises this gen

Why bring that up? Guilty conscience?



                            

gameover on 12 July 2009

i bring it up because always if someone says smth negative about a console everyone is saying its a fanboy bla bla



Around the Network
Carl on 12 July 2009

I just need to ask, when did you sell your PS3?



                            

gameover on 12 July 2009

this week
i asked last week in this forum if its possible to change the ps3 controller because i didnt like it
i found a converter in ebay for using the 360 one but finally i decided to sell the console to a friend
he plays mostly pro evo soccer so its ok for him



gameover on 12 July 2009

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=78719&page=1

the link :)



Seece on 12 July 2009
BMaker11 said:
Stats87 said:
Why was he talking about the controller? Shouldn't he be talking about the issues with their multiplatform reviews?

Also, is he insinuating that they gave 360 versions better reviews because the controller? That's a little too subjective for my taste.

My thoughts exactly. And the funny thing is.....the 360 controller is JUST LIKE the original Xbox controller, except for the black and white buttons becoming shoulder buttons and the start and select:

I guess the controller is why on GRiD, the PS3 version's crash physics (dubbed the 360 version) are better than the PS3's crash physics

/shrugs

Thats rubbish, have you actually played with both of them, you notice the difference immediatly and the 360 controller is much more comfortable.



 

Carl on 12 July 2009

Ahh.
I thought i recognised you and your hate for the analogues.

Must have been from the thread you talk about.