By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Battlefield : Reduce LAG by playing on PSN? what?

madskillz on 10 July 2009
Skeeuk said:
the psn version is almost guaranteed to have less lag than live counterpart.

im gonna download it later.

Troll much? Do you really believe 90 percent of the foolishness you post?

OT: It wouldn't let me on at all last night on LIVE. I did notice the message that they were adding servers.



Around the Network
outlawauron on 10 July 2009
disolitude said:
nightsurge said:
Not our fault that the 360 version was immensely more popular than they had imagined. They were busy like crazy all day yesterday adding servers.

Stupid 3rd party servers...P2P FTW.

Its not like the game is doing 30 vs 30 battles...

Actually, P2P is why Gears 2 is broken as it is.

I don't plan on playing many more online games (if any at all) unless they have dedicated servers like PSN.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Hyams on 10 July 2009
NYANKS said:
Isn't it just stating that you have to play on the "SERVERS NEAREST TO YOU" to reduce lag on PSN? I think thats the important part of the statement no? Maybe the fathere the server location from you, the more the lag? Thats what the ad makes it sound like.......

This.

The ad is badly worded. It doesn't say reduce lag by playing on the PSN - it says reduce lag by playing on the servers that are nearest to you, whilst playing the game on the PSN.



nightsurge on 10 July 2009
outlawauron said:
disolitude said:
nightsurge said:
Not our fault that the 360 version was immensely more popular than they had imagined. They were busy like crazy all day yesterday adding servers.

Stupid 3rd party servers...P2P FTW.

Its not like the game is doing 30 vs 30 battles...

Actually, P2P is why Gears 2 is broken as it is.

I don't plan on playing many more online games (if any at all) unless they have dedicated servers like PSN.

Most PSN games (at least multi-plats for sure) use P2P as well....

Only ones that use dedicated servers are Resistance, Killzone, and Socom that I can think of off hand.  But I do agree.  P2P kills Gears 2 because of the host advantage it gives.  Whenever I am host, I get some slight host advantage, but I have a good enough connection that everyone is nearly equal.  Unfortunately Gears of War 2 picks the worst possible hosts 90% of the time....



deathgod33 on 10 July 2009

its fake, but i think its true, about psn having less lag.



 

 

 

 

Around the Network
outlawauron on 10 July 2009
nightsurge said:
outlawauron said:
disolitude said:
nightsurge said:
Not our fault that the 360 version was immensely more popular than they had imagined. They were busy like crazy all day yesterday adding servers.

Stupid 3rd party servers...P2P FTW.

Its not like the game is doing 30 vs 30 battles...

Actually, P2P is why Gears 2 is broken as it is.

I don't plan on playing many more online games (if any at all) unless they have dedicated servers like PSN.

Most PSN games (at least multi-plats for sure) use P2P as well....

Only ones that use dedicated servers are Resistance, Killzone, and Socom that I can think of off hand.  But I do agree.  P2P kills Gears 2 because of the host advantage it gives.  Whenever I am host, I get some slight host advantage, but I have a good enough connection that everyone is nearly equal.  Unfortunately Gears of War 2 picks the worst possible hosts 90% of the time....

I thought just about all use dedicated servers. I know Warhawk did as well.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

TheThunder on 10 July 2009

seriously this game is great you get more than your money's worth for $15



bonkers555 on 10 July 2009
Skeeuk said:
the psn version is almost guaranteed to have less lag than live counterpart.

im gonna download it later.


Street Fighter IV lag like hell on the PSN.  I only purchase multiplat Fighting and JRPG games for the PS3 because I like the PS3 controllers better then the 360 because of the stupid D-Pad.  I might have to change that with Tekken 6 because of connection problems I have with the PSN.  On a side note Killzone 2 rarely have any lags though.



My Video Games Collection/Set-Up.

Necromunda on 10 July 2009

Played the demo, I did not notice any serious lag... sweet game tho.
Just game shared it from a friend, so if anyone wants to meet up for a game or two let me know.



nightsurge on 11 July 2009
outlawauron said:
nightsurge said:
outlawauron said:
disolitude said:
nightsurge said:
Not our fault that the 360 version was immensely more popular than they had imagined. They were busy like crazy all day yesterday adding servers.

Stupid 3rd party servers...P2P FTW.

Its not like the game is doing 30 vs 30 battles...

Actually, P2P is why Gears 2 is broken as it is.

I don't plan on playing many more online games (if any at all) unless they have dedicated servers like PSN.

Most PSN games (at least multi-plats for sure) use P2P as well....

Only ones that use dedicated servers are Resistance, Killzone, and Socom that I can think of off hand.  But I do agree.  P2P kills Gears 2 because of the host advantage it gives.  Whenever I am host, I get some slight host advantage, but I have a good enough connection that everyone is nearly equal.  Unfortunately Gears of War 2 picks the worst possible hosts 90% of the time....

I thought just about all use dedicated servers. I know Warhawk did as well.

Just first party PS3 exclusives.  And even then I'm not sure they all do, but yes Warhawk did as well.