By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Why did Microsoft succeed where Sega failed?

     Why did Microsoft succed where Sega failed with Saturn and Dreamcast?

     Sega had a very successful run in the 16 bit era with the Genesis, much as Microsoft did in the 6th gen with the original Xbox.  Perhaps, they even had a better showing against the Super Nintendo than the original xbox did against the PS2.  For much of the 16 bit gen, they certainly slugged it out toe to toe with their biggest rival in the game's industry.  So, why did Saturn fail to keep the fans they had earned in the 16 bit era?  People always talk about the rushed release and high price of the Saturn when it was launched.  However, I feel that there was some other reason the Saturn just didn't catch on.  The 3DO had launched with a higher price tag than Saturn and was starting to establish itself as a major console in 1995 following the release of Gex and Street Fighter II for the system.  So, I don't see why Sega's Saturn was unable to do likewise and continue to at least be a third pillar of gaming during the 32 bit era.  I know I bought my Saturn Day One.  It might be that the Saturn failed to establish itself because of a lack of high quality games on the system, but Astal, Nights, and the Panzer Dragoon Saga did establish themselves as cult classics on the failed system.  It still remains a msytery to me why Saturn failed to do better than it did.

    Much like 360 jump startet the current gen with its launch in 2005 a full year before Wii and PS3, the Dreamcast jump started the 6th gen with its launch in the Autumn of 1999, and over the next year it had a lineup of games released that have to be considered to be among the greatest lineup ever released for a console in one year's time and especially during a launch year.  I would say the games that appeared on Dreamcast between its launch in 1999 and the beginning of 2001:  Titles like Resident Evil:  Code Veronica, Phantasy Star Online, improved versions of Rayman:  The Great Escape, and the Tony Hawk games when those series were huge, Shenmue, Skies of Arcadia, Grandia II, Sonic Adventure, Jet Set Radio, Samba De Amigo rate right up with there with the best year's for any console in history and that they were almost all better than any exclusives that came the 360's way between its launch in 2005 and the end of 2006 (with the possible exception of Gears of War), yet the Dreamcast failed to establish itself despite its incredible lineup of games whereas the 360 has gone on to establish itself as the dominant HD console worldwide and the second best selling console this gen.

     Why did Microsoft and 360 succeed where Sega failed with Saturn and Dreamcast?

 



Around the Network

Money.



It's just that simple.

deep pockets. - buying games/franchises and being able to wait for a profit was key.

and less of a desire to implode. - not making new systems or add-on constantly helped as well



"But as always, technology refused to be dignity's bitch."--Vance DeGeneres

 

http://cheezburger.com/danatblair/lolz/View/4772264960

MC>sonic.

sonic sucks.



"I like my steaks how i like my women.  Bloody and all over my face"

"Its like sex, but with a winner!"

MrBubbles Review Threads: Bill Gates, Jak II, Kingdom Hearts II, The Strangers, Sly 2, Crackdown, Zohan, Quarantine, Klungo Sssavesss Teh World, MS@E3'08, WATCHMEN(movie), Shadow of the Colossus, The Saboteur

Sony more money then Sega
M$ more money then Sony



Around the Network

Sega could have ass raped everyone had they had united management in 1994-1997.

With America pulling one way, Japan pulling the other way...and neither knew what the other market needed to succeed.

They did get united with the Dreamcast but it was too late. Money ran out and market changed...



MonstaMack said:
Money.

This



                            

bonkers555 said:
Sony more money then Sega
M$ more money then Sony


This but M$ has way more than Sony.

Sony and Sega there wasnt as big a gap.



Only Microsoft could be 6 billion dollars in the hole and still be hard headed enough to continue their endeavor in the console market.



FootballFan said:
bonkers555 said:
Sony more money then Sega
M$ more money then Sony


This but M$ has way more than Sony.

Sony and Sega there wasnt as big a gap.

Nonsence...sega was profitable every year until 1997. They lost 700 million in 1997 and 1998 combined and they were almost out of business.

Sony lost what 3.1 billion last year and are still going strong. There is a huge $ difference between sony and sega.

Besides, sony and MS company dollar really doesn't matter.  Gaming is a small side business for both and I believe Sony is investing more money in to gaming supporting all platforms than MS ever did.

So conclusion

Sony$ >>>> Sega$

MS$~= Sony$ (in gaming)