| Steroid said: You'll notice that people who put the PS2 up on a pedestal are usually people in their teens/tweens. They missed the SNES era, which explains why they can't imagine a console with a better lineup then PS2 had. Keep in mind that the PS2 is nine years old; the PS3 only two and a half. The only place where PS2 dominates PS3 is RPG's. Fortunately it looks like PS3's RPG lineup is set to vasty improve. |
And what did the SNES offer that the PS2 didn't? PS2 has Resident Evil 4, Metal Gear Solid 2 and 3, Ico/SotC, Gran Turismo 4, GTA3, and tons of other games in a WIDE variety of genres. Those experiences aren't matched by anything the SNES offered. The PS2 had arguably the widest library of any console yet as developers started to come to grips with the 3D realm, and 3D controls (dual analogs FTW). I can understand if you are a hardcore platformer/JRPG fan and love what the SNES offered, but I would definitely give the edge to the PS2. Honestly, list the best SNES games, and 90% of them will be JRPGs and platformers.
I don't know if the PS3 will have a better library than the PS2. The potential is definitely there though. It won't have the numbers, but it could definitely have better quality.











