umm isnt that IGN UK??
ive rarely ever agreed with the UK over ign besides a couple of times
Owner of all consoles cept DS.....Currently in love with prototype!
Even if the reviewer found it to be 7.5...is that a terrible score these days?
| disolitude said: Even if the reviewer found it to be 7.5...is that a terrible score these days? |
YES.
"I don't have time to play video games anymore, but if I did, I would definitely choose the PlayStation 3 instead of the 360" - President Barack Obama
Torillian said:
But how good is 20 hours when it comes to open world games? Pretty sure it's short for that type of game, and then the lack of replayability hurts it as well as the repetitive gameplay (think I read that, not totally sure). I'm not saying they're right in giving it a 6.5, but I think if fits what is written just find and you can't write it off just because the game is 20 hours long. |
I think there are 3 ways of looking at it.
A. Your way.
B. All games should be assigned a dollar per hour merit, regaurdless of genre.
C. There should be no "value" merit. Length needn't even be mentioned, but rather the fun of the experience.
I'm more of a "C" person myself.
Why?
CoD4 was 4 hours long. I played through the SP exactly 1 time.
I still own the game, but never played it again.
Best 60 dollars I ever spent.
Value rating my ass. Dollar per entertainment hour my butt. It is ALL about the experience.
If you don't like the experience, fine, but don't move that over to some arbitrary "value" rating. Just say, "This game sucks so bad you'll never play it again." Have balls, don't just come up with lame excuses to flame a game. 20 hours is PLENTY of length for any action game. If you like playing through it once, It's a SANDBOX GAME! You will play in the sandbox.
They(Not IGN as far as I know) pulled this same crap with Crackdown(saying after the orbs were collected, you would never play it again). Seems very poorly thought out, to me.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.
This is NOT IGN UK
This IS IGN
IGN Uk and AU haven'y reviewed it yet.
infamous8 said:
YES.
|
Oh come on man, we all know you are gleeful about this because you are championing some PS3 exclusive or another, and feel that this game is in direct competition. Nobody buys your guise. IGN is not the only site that matters, and even if they were, the game is still highly reviewed from other source, and it is all OPINION. Infamous has an 8.5 or something from Metacritic. Go troll a site that didn't like that excellent game, and stop trying to stealthtroll fans of this game. You are enjoying this review, that is obvious, but enough is enough. You are trying to make this review more important than it actually is, and in doing so you make a satirical mockery of everything petty and mean about biased console fans on internet forums.
The one thing you are, at least, is predictable.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.
I never read the reviews anyway. The average score on metacritic is all that matters to me. IGN are usually on par with average review score of games.
| PS3beats360 said: I never read the reviews anyway. The average score on metacritic is all that matters to me. IGN are usually on par with average review score of games. |
....you should probably read them. There is a lot more information there, than in some ambigious letter, or waffle, or star, or number, assigned at the end of said paragraphs.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.
ZenfoldorVGI said:
Oh come on man, we all know you are gleeful about this because you are championing some PS3 exclusive or another, and feel that this game is in direct competition. Nobody buys your guise. IGN is not the only site that matters, and even if they were, the game is still highly reviewed from other source, and it is all OPINION. Infamous has an 8.5 or something from Metacritic. Go troll a site that didn't like that excellent game, and stop trying to stealthtroll fans of this game. You are enjoying this review, that is obvious, but enough is enough. You are trying to make this review more important than it actually is, and in doing so you make a satirical mockery of everything petty and mean about biased console fans on internet forums. The one thing you are, at least, is predictable. |
You have a great argument here, but you can't argue with fanboys.
| PS3beats360 said: I never read the reviews anyway. The average score on metacritic is all that matters to me. IGN are usually on par with average review score of games. |
Lol...I bet you like pie charts too.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
